From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] iio: add support for hardware fifo
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:23:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546B8084.6080400@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE1zotJik56OsM8-6Hg9rGqJT_VdRL0VvXv4kjEhBX6W0ijYLQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/18/2014 06:04 PM, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:
>> On 11/18/2014 04:03 PM, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Hence we started with something that at least superficially (I haven't
>>>> had a chance to go through the implementation in detail yet)
>>>> looks similar to what you have but ended up changing the method of
>>>> signalling to and from userspace.
>>>> Hardware buffer -> Software buffer -> user space.
>>>> Userspace watershed control -> Software buffer watershed control
>>>> -> Hardware buffer watershed control.
>>>> If userspace sets the watershed to say 16 then, as well as setting
>>>> that level in the software buffer it should be passed on to the
>>>> device driver allowing the watershed there to be set appropriately.
>>>> Now things get interesting if userspace sets the watershed to a value
>>>> that makes no sense for the hardware (say 17 on a device that does
>>>> power of 2 values only) as then it will have to fall back to
>>>> grabbing every one (Watershed of 1). Perhaps we can provide 'hints'
>>>> for this?
>>>
>>>
>>> As far as I understood, the proposed watermark implementation only
>>> affects the device buffer and as I mentioned above that will not help
>>> with reducing the interrupt rate.
>>
>>
>> By setting the watershed level the userspace application tells you that it
>> is OK with getting data with a higher latency than one sample. This allows
>> the driver to configure the FIFO level and hence reduce the interrupt rate.
>>
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> The implementation (as proposed in the patch by Josselin and Yannick)
> does not inform the driver of changes to watermark, that is only
> visible to core iio / buffer logic.
That should be trivial to add though.
>
> Also, the watermark alone is not enough to properly support hardware
> fifos: the fifo can operate in multiple modes, we need to read data
> from the hardware fifo even when the watermark interrupt is not issued
> (the flush operation in the current patch set).
What kind of modes are there?
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-17 17:55 [RFC 0/8] iio: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:55 ` [RFC 1/8] " Octavian Purdila
2014-11-18 13:37 ` jic23
2014-11-18 15:21 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 2/8] iio: bmc150: refactor slope duration and threshold update Octavian Purdila
2014-11-23 21:58 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-11-23 22:16 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 3/8] iio: bmc150: refactor interrupt enabling Octavian Purdila
2014-11-23 22:02 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-11-23 22:24 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 4/8] iio: bmc150: exit early if event / trigger state is not changed Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 5/8] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_interrupt Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 6/8] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_trigger Octavian Purdila
2014-11-23 23:06 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-11-24 10:42 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-24 20:26 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-11-25 16:06 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 7/8] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_event Octavian Purdila
2014-11-17 17:56 ` [RFC 8/8] iio: bmc150: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2014-11-18 13:49 ` jic23
2014-11-18 15:31 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-24 10:37 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-11-18 13:24 ` [RFC 0/8] iio: " jic23
2014-11-18 15:03 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-18 16:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-11-18 17:04 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-18 17:23 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-11-18 19:35 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-19 11:48 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-11-19 12:33 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-12 12:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-11-19 13:32 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-26 13:06 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-01 21:19 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-12-02 9:13 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-12 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-12 13:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-12 12:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-11-18 15:35 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2014-11-18 16:41 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546B8084.6080400@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).