linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@intel.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: ensure scan index is unique at buffer register
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:50:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548AD69A.4040303@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548364C2.10401@gmx.de>

On 06/12/14 20:19, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Vlad Dogaru wrote on 25.11.2014 13:48:
>> Having two or more channels with the same positive scan_index field
>> makes no sense.  Prevent this situation by failing to register a buffer
>> if two scan indexes are identical.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@intel.com>
A sensible little sanity check that might avoid a few bugs.

I'm guessing will need a rebase (along with Harmut's point)
given the buffer set from Lars I applied earlier today.

Jonathan
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>> index f971f79..422b29e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>> @@ -309,6 +309,30 @@ static int iio_buffer_add_channel_sysfs(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int iio_check_unique_scan_index(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> +				       const struct iio_chan_spec *channels,
>> +				       int num_channels)
>> +{
>> +	int i, j;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_channels - 1; i++) {
>> +		if (channels[i].scan_index < 0)
>> +			continue;
>> +		for (j = i + 1; j < num_channels; j++) {
>> +			if (channels[j].scan_index < 0)
>> +				continue;
> This check up here is unnecessary, since channels[i].scan_index is already equal or
> greater zero, so the check below results in a false for channels[j].scan_index smaller
> than zero and cause a new loop iteration anyway.
> 
>> +			if (channels[i].scan_index == channels[j].scan_index) {
>> +				dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
>> +					"duplicate scan index %d\n",
>> +					channels[i].scan_index);
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static const char * const iio_scan_elements_group_name = "scan_elements";
>>  
>>  int iio_buffer_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> @@ -320,6 +344,10 @@ int iio_buffer_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>  	struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
>>  	int ret, i, attrn, attrcount, attrcount_orig = 0;
>>  
>> +	ret = iio_check_unique_scan_index(indio_dev, channels, num_channels);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>>  	if (buffer->attrs)
>>  		indio_dev->groups[indio_dev->groupcounter++] = buffer->attrs;
>>  
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-12 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25 12:48 [PATCH 0/4] Add valid sample channel Vlad Dogaru
2014-11-25 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] iio: dummy: set scan_index for unbuffered channels Vlad Dogaru
2014-11-25 16:11   ` Daniel Baluta
2014-12-12 11:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-11-25 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] iio: ensure scan index is unique at buffer register Vlad Dogaru
2014-12-06 20:19   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-12 11:50     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2014-11-25 12:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] iio: add valid sample channel Vlad Dogaru
2014-11-25 12:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] iio: illustrate the use of a " Vlad Dogaru
2014-11-25 16:36 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-11-25 16:55   ` Daniel Baluta
2014-11-25 17:00     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-11-25 17:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-11-25 18:27         ` Octavian Purdila
2014-11-25 18:53           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-11-26 12:58         ` Daniel Baluta
2014-12-01 20:06           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-12-01 20:46             ` Daniel Baluta
2014-12-01 20:51               ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-12-01 21:03                 ` Daniel Baluta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548AD69A.4040303@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vlad.dogaru@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).