linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@samsung.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Karol Wrona <wrona.vy@gmail.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub bindings
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:29:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <549D549C.1000803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548FDFA2.1090002@samsung.com>

On 16/12/14 07:30, Karol Wrona wrote:
> On 12/06/2014 03:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 05/12/14 19:54, Karol Wrona wrote:
>>> Add sensorhub bindings for sensorhub on Galaxy Gear 2.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: I4ee25aef33c21a4662de230841de9a8684f2c26b
>>> Signed-off-by: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@samsung.com>
>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> Looks good to me.  Comments inline.  Note I either need a device tree
>> ack or a long delay before I can take this though.  Unlikely to get the
>> device tree ack as you haven't cc'd the maintainers or list ;)
> I am curious about DT community opinion and I prefer to know it before
> v4 sending.
They have a lot of patches to review, so might take a while ;)
> 
>>
>> I've added the cc's. Please make sure future versions have them or you'll
>> just be slowing the process down (particularly if no one notices they 
>> are missing!)
> Thanks, I will remember that.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt          |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..2aca0c3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>>> +Samsung Sensorhub driver
>>> +
>>> +Sensorhub is a MCU which manages several sensors and also plays the role
>>> +of a virtual sensor device.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: "samsung,sensorhub-rinato" or "samsung,sensorhub-thermostat"
>>> +- spi-max-frequency: max SPI clock frequency
>>> +- interrupt-parent: interrupt parent
>>> +- interrupts: communication interrupt
>>> +- ap-mcu-gpio: [out] ap to sensorhub line - used during communication
>>> +- mcu-ap-gpio: [in] sensorhub to ap - used during communication
>>> +- mcu-reset: [out] sensorhub reset
>> as commented in previous patch, why do the first two have -gpio and the
>> third not?
> Ok, all 3 will have "gpios" ending
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- sensor's nodes:
>>> +  compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-accel"
>>> +  compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-gyro"
>>> +  compatible = "samsung,adpd142"
>>> +
>>> +Sensor compatibles are used to match proper sensor driver to real sensor on
>>> +the board. The firmware does not give such information, so it helps to specify
>>> +some sensors properties. Sensors have "samsung" prefixes because frequently
>>> +they will not have much in common with sensors used without sensorhub because
>>> +it can do some data processing.
>> We'll keep that under review.  Might make sense, sometimes, to unify the
>> drivers.  The different compatible will probably still be needed, but if
>> these devices proliferate I don't want two drivers for everything that
>> gets stuck behind them.
> I think that sensorhub is very similar hid-sensor (without hotpluging) where
> every sensor type has its own representation.  The real sensors are not driven
> directly but by external MCU so very often these sensors will not have much
> common with real ones.  So I wonder if it could be better to resign from these
> sensor compatibles and represent each sensor as mfd cell so optional properties
> probably will dropped (?)
Might do.
> Generally I intended to have i.e. one ssp-accel driver if they use another
> accelerometer then mpu6500 the buffering manner and sysfs will be handled in the
> same way.  I think I was mistaken with these compatibles.  There is also some
> probability that the firmware will be fixed someday and it will be able to tell
> more about sensor then the type.
Would be good - particularly if we start to get lots of variants out in the wild.
> 
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> +	shub_spi: shub {
>>> +		compatible = "samsung,sensorhub-rinato";
>>> +		spi-max-frequency = <5000000>;
>>> +		interrupt-parent = <&gpx0>;
>>> +		interrupts = <2 0>;
>>> +		ap-mcu-gpio = <&gpx0 0 0>;
>>> +		mcu-ap-gpio = <&gpx0 4 0>;
>>> +		mcu-reset = <&gpx0 5 0>;
>>> +		sensor@0 {
>>> +			compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-accel";
>>> +		};
>>> +		sensor@1 {
>>> +			compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-gyro";
>>> +		};
>>> +		sensor@2 {
>>> +			compatible = "samsung,adpd142";
>>> +		};
>>> +	};
>>>
>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-26 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-05 19:54 [PATCH v3 0/5] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub driver Karol Wrona
2014-12-05 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] " Karol Wrona
2014-12-06 14:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-16 10:17     ` Karol Wrona
2014-12-26 12:27       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-17 22:11   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-05 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub bindings Karol Wrona
2014-12-06 14:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-16  7:30     ` Karol Wrona
2014-12-26 12:29       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2014-12-05 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub iio commons Karol Wrona
2014-12-06 14:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-13 16:03     ` Karol Wrona
2015-01-13 17:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-17 22:15   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-05 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub accelerometer sensor Karol Wrona
2014-12-06 14:52   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-08 10:41     ` Karol Wrona
2014-12-26 12:34       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-17 22:18   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-05 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub gyroscope sensor Karol Wrona
2014-12-06 14:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-17 22:20   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-05 20:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Add sensorhub driver Karol Wrona

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=549D549C.1000803@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=k.wrona@samsung.com \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wrona.vy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).