linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] iio: add watermark logic to iio read and poll
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:22:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C55EAD.8020404@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419122556-8100-4-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com>

Octavian Purdila schrieb am 21.12.2014 um 01:42:
> From: Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr>
> 
> Currently the IIO buffer blocking read only wait until at least one
> data element is available.
> This patch makes the reader sleep until enough data is collected before
> returning to userspace. This should limit the read() calls count when
> trying to get data in batches.
> 

Hi,
I have a question and a minor recommendation, please see inline.

> Co-author: Yannick Bedhomme <yannick.bedhomme@mobile-devices.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Josselin Costanzi <josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr>
> [rebased and remove buffer timeout]
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio  |  10 +++
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c        | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/iio/kfifo_buf.c                  |  11 ++-
>  drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c |   4 +-
>  include/linux/iio/buffer.h               |   9 ++-
>  5 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> index df5e69e..7260f1f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> @@ -1142,3 +1142,13 @@ Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
>  Description:
>  		This attribute is used to read the number of steps taken by the user
>  		since the last reboot while activated.
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/buffer/low_watermark
> +KernelVersion:	3.20
> +Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> +		A single positive integer specifying the maximum number of scan
> +		elements to wait for.
> +		Poll will block until the watermark is reached.
> +		Blocking read will wait until the minimum between the requested
> +		read amount or the low water mark is available.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index bc55434..7f74c7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static bool iio_buffer_is_active(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  	return !list_empty(&buf->buffer_list);
>  }
>  
> -static bool iio_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buf)
> +static size_t iio_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  {
>  	return buf->access->data_available(buf);
>  }
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ ssize_t iio_buffer_read_first_n_outer(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = filp->private_data;
>  	struct iio_buffer *rb = indio_dev->buffer;
> +	size_t datum_size = rb->bytes_per_datum;
> +	size_t to_read = min_t(size_t, n / datum_size, rb->low_watermark);
Are you sure that rb->bytes_per_datum can not be zero, when accessed here? From
what I could see, there is a chance of it being zero, if the scan_mask is clear
and timestamps are disabled.

> +	size_t count = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!indio_dev->info)
> @@ -62,25 +65,38 @@ ssize_t iio_buffer_read_first_n_outer(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	do {
> -		if (!iio_buffer_data_available(rb)) {
> -			if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> -				return -EAGAIN;
> -
> +		if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> +			if (!iio_buffer_data_available(rb)) {
> +				ret = -EAGAIN;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		} else {
>  			ret = wait_event_interruptible(rb->pollq,
> -					iio_buffer_data_available(rb) ||
> -					indio_dev->info == NULL);
> +			       iio_buffer_data_available(rb) >= to_read ||
> +						       indio_dev->info == NULL);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
> -			if (indio_dev->info == NULL)
> -				return -ENODEV;
> +			if (indio_dev->info == NULL) {
> +				ret = -ENODEV;
> +				break;
> +			}
>  		}
>  
> -		ret = rb->access->read_first_n(rb, n, buf);
> -		if (ret == 0 && (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
> -			ret = -EAGAIN;
> -	 } while (ret == 0);
> +		ret = rb->access->read_first_n(rb, n, buf + count);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			break;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +		count += ret;
> +		n -= ret;
> +		to_read -= ret / datum_size;
> +	 } while (to_read > 0);
> +
> +	if (count)
> +		return count;
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return -EAGAIN;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -96,9 +112,8 @@ unsigned int iio_buffer_poll(struct file *filp,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	poll_wait(filp, &rb->pollq, wait);
> -	if (iio_buffer_data_available(rb))
> +	if (iio_buffer_data_available(rb) >= rb->low_watermark)
>  		return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> -	/* need a way of knowing if there may be enough data... */
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -123,6 +138,7 @@ void iio_buffer_init(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->buffer_list);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&buffer->pollq);
>  	kref_init(&buffer->ref);
> +	buffer->low_watermark = 1;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(iio_buffer_init);
>  
> @@ -418,7 +434,16 @@ static ssize_t iio_buffer_write_length(struct device *dev,
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>  
> -	return ret ? ret : len;
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (buffer->length)
> +		val = buffer->length;
> +
> +	if (val < buffer->low_watermark)
> +		buffer->low_watermark = val;
> +
> +	return len;
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t iio_buffer_show_enable(struct device *dev,
> @@ -472,6 +497,7 @@ static void iio_buffer_activate(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  static void iio_buffer_deactivate(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
>  {
>  	list_del_init(&buffer->buffer_list);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&buffer->pollq);
>  	iio_buffer_put(buffer);
>  }
>  
> @@ -752,16 +778,59 @@ done:
>  
>  static const char * const iio_scan_elements_group_name = "scan_elements";
>  
> +static ssize_t iio_buffer_show_watermark(struct device *dev,
> +					 struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					 char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> +	struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", buffer->low_watermark);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t iio_buffer_store_watermark(struct device *dev,
> +					  struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					  const char *buf,
> +					  size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> +	struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (val > buffer->length)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +	if (iio_buffer_is_active(indio_dev->buffer)) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	buffer->low_watermark = val;
> +	ret = 0;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +	return ret ? ret : len;
> +}
> +
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(length, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, iio_buffer_read_length,
>  		   iio_buffer_write_length);
>  static struct device_attribute dev_attr_length_ro = __ATTR(length,
>  	S_IRUGO, iio_buffer_read_length, NULL);
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>  		   iio_buffer_show_enable, iio_buffer_store_enable);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(low_watermark, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> +		   iio_buffer_show_watermark, iio_buffer_store_watermark);
>  
>  static struct attribute *iio_buffer_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_length.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_enable.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_low_watermark.attr,
>  };
>  
>  int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> @@ -942,8 +1011,17 @@ static const void *iio_demux(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>  static int iio_push_to_buffer(struct iio_buffer *buffer, const void *data)
>  {
>  	const void *dataout = iio_demux(buffer, data);
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	return buffer->access->store_to(buffer, dataout);
> +	ret = buffer->access->store_to(buffer, dataout);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* We can't just test for watermark to decide if we wake the poll queue
> +	 * because read may request less samples than the watermark
I think this comment could end with a full stop. Also, first line should be
empty.

> +	 */
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&buffer->pollq);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void iio_buffer_demux_free(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/kfifo_buf.c b/drivers/iio/kfifo_buf.c
> index b20a9cf..30a9bfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/kfifo_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/kfifo_buf.c
> @@ -83,9 +83,6 @@ static int iio_store_to_kfifo(struct iio_buffer *r,
>  	ret = kfifo_in(&kf->kf, data, 1);
>  	if (ret != 1)
>  		return -EBUSY;
> -
> -	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&r->pollq, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -109,16 +106,16 @@ static int iio_read_first_n_kfifo(struct iio_buffer *r,
>  	return copied;
>  }
>  
> -static bool iio_kfifo_buf_data_available(struct iio_buffer *r)
> +static size_t iio_kfifo_buf_data_available(struct iio_buffer *r)
>  {
>  	struct iio_kfifo *kf = iio_to_kfifo(r);
> -	bool empty;
> +	size_t samples;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&kf->user_lock);
> -	empty = kfifo_is_empty(&kf->kf);
> +	samples = kfifo_len(&kf->kf);
>  	mutex_unlock(&kf->user_lock);
>  
> -	return !empty;
> +	return samples;
>  }
>  
>  static void iio_kfifo_buffer_release(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c
> index f76a268..1e65dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_ring.c
> @@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ error_ret:
>  	return ret ? ret : num_read;
>  }
>  
> -static bool sca3000_ring_buf_data_available(struct iio_buffer *r)
> +static size_t sca3000_ring_buf_data_available(struct iio_buffer *r)
>  {
> -	return r->stufftoread;
> +	return r->stufftoread ? r->low_watermark : 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> index b65850a..768593c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ struct iio_buffer;
>   * struct iio_buffer_access_funcs - access functions for buffers.
>   * @store_to:		actually store stuff to the buffer
>   * @read_first_n:	try to get a specified number of bytes (must exist)
> - * @data_available:	indicates whether data for reading from the buffer is
> - *			available.
> + * @data_available:	indicates how much data is available for reading from
> + *			the buffer.
>   * @request_update:	if a parameter change has been marked, update underlying
>   *			storage.
>   * @set_bytes_per_datum:set number of bytes per datum
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct iio_buffer_access_funcs {
>  	int (*read_first_n)(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>  			    size_t n,
>  			    char __user *buf);
> -	bool (*data_available)(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> +	size_t (*data_available)(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  
>  	int (*request_update)(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct iio_buffer_access_funcs {
>   * @demux_bounce:	[INTERN] buffer for doing gather from incoming scan.
>   * @buffer_list:	[INTERN] entry in the devices list of current buffers.
>   * @ref:		[INTERN] reference count of the buffer.
> + * @low_watermark:	[INTERN] number of datums for poll/blocking read to
> + * 			wait for.
>   */
>  struct iio_buffer {
>  	int					length;
> @@ -90,6 +92,7 @@ struct iio_buffer {
>  	void					*demux_bounce;
>  	struct list_head			buffer_list;
>  	struct kref				ref;
> +	unsigned int				low_watermark;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-25 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-21  0:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] iio: add support for hardware buffers Octavian Purdila
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iio: buffer: fix custom buffer attributes copy Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 11:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-04 11:34     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-04 16:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] iio: buffer: refactor buffer attributes setup Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 11:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-05 10:48     ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] iio: add watermark logic to iio read and poll Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 15:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-25 21:22   ` Hartmut Knaack [this message]
2015-01-26  9:40     ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] iio: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:07   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-05 11:29     ` Octavian Purdila
2015-02-04 17:08       ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-05 21:36         ` Octavian Purdila
2015-02-08 10:53           ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-09 13:44             ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-28 23:46   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-29 11:38     ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-29 22:49       ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-02-04 17:18         ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-04 17:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] iio: bmc150: refactor slope duration and threshold update Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-06 18:53     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-01-28  9:22       ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-28 17:15         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] iio: bmc150: refactor interrupt enabling Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-28 10:33     ` Octavian Purdila
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] iio: bmc150: exit early if event / trigger state is not changed Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_interrupt Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-28 11:09     ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-28 13:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_trigger Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_event Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 16:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-21  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] iio: bmc150: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2015-01-04 17:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-28 19:26     ` Octavian Purdila
2015-02-04 17:16       ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-04 20:18         ` Octavian Purdila
2015-02-05 11:20           ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-05 20:04             ` Octavian Purdila
2015-02-06 12:19               ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C55EAD.8020404@gmx.de \
    --to=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=josselin.costanzi@mobile-devices.fr \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).