public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_trigger
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:07:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D74358.108@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422662408-8149-9-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com>

On 31/01/15 00:00, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Add a separate structure for triggers and add the infrastructure to
> support an arbitrary number of triggers. Each trigger is associated
> with an interrupt and has an enabled/disabled state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Another sensible patch. One trivial point inline.  Otherwise, I'd
like an Ack from Srinivas on this as it's a non trivial bit of refactoring
and despite seeming like a good idea does add a fair bit of code!

J
> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> index b23ad1b..c05aa43 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> @@ -152,14 +152,22 @@ struct bmc150_accel_interrupt {
>  	atomic_t users;
>  };
>  
> +struct bmc150_accel_trigger {
> +	struct bmc150_accel_interrupt *intr;
> +	struct bmc150_accel_data *data;
> +	struct iio_trigger *indio_trig;
> +	bool enabled;
> +	int (*setup)(struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t, bool state);
> +};
> +
>  #define BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS		2
> +#define BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS		2
>  
>  struct bmc150_accel_data {
>  	struct i2c_client *client;
>  	struct bmc150_accel_interrupt interrupts[BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS];
> -	struct iio_trigger *dready_trig;
> -	struct iio_trigger *motion_trig;
>  	atomic_t active_intr;
> +	struct bmc150_accel_trigger triggers[BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS];
>  	struct mutex mutex;
>  	s16 buffer[8];
>  	u8 bw_bits;
> @@ -167,8 +175,6 @@ struct bmc150_accel_data {
>  	u32 slope_thres;
>  	u32 range;
>  	int ev_enable_state;
> -	bool dready_trigger_on;
> -	bool motion_trigger_on;
>  	int64_t timestamp;
>  	const struct bmc150_accel_chip_info *chip_info;
>  };
> @@ -309,6 +315,15 @@ static int bmc150_accel_update_slope(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int bmc150_accel_any_motion_setup(struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t,
> +					 bool state)
> +{
> +	if (state)
> +		return bmc150_accel_update_slope(t->data);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -787,11 +802,14 @@ static int bmc150_accel_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  				   struct iio_trigger *trig)
>  {
>  	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	int i;
>  
> -	if (data->dready_trig != trig && data->motion_trig != trig)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	for (i = 0; i < BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS; i++) {
> +		if (data->triggers[i].indio_trig == trig)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
>  static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL(
> @@ -963,12 +981,12 @@ err_read:
>  
>  static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
>  {
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> -	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> +	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* new data interrupts don't need ack */
> -	if (data->dready_trigger_on)
> +	if (t == &t->data->triggers[0])
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> @@ -990,42 +1008,32 @@ static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
>  static int bmc150_accel_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
>  						   bool state)
>  {
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> -	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> +	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  
> -	if (data->motion_trig == trig) {
> -		if (data->motion_trigger_on == state) {
> -			mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		if (data->dready_trigger_on == state) {
> +	if (t->enabled == state) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (t->setup) {
> +		ret = t->setup(t, state);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
>  			mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> -			return 0;
> +			return ret;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (data->motion_trig == trig) {
> -		ret = bmc150_accel_update_slope(data);
> -		if (!ret)
> -			ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data,
> -							 &data->interrupts[1],
> -							 state);
> -	} else {
> -		ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data, &data->interrupts[0],
> -						 state);
> -	}
> +	ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data, t->intr, state);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -	if (data->motion_trig == trig)
> -		data->motion_trigger_on = state;
> -	else
> -		data->dready_trigger_on = state;
> +
> +	t->enabled = state;
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>  
> @@ -1079,7 +1087,7 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_event_handler(int irq, void *private)
>  							dir),
>  							data->timestamp);
>  ack_intr_status:
> -	if (!data->dready_trigger_on)
> +	if (!data->triggers[0].enabled)
>  		ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client,
>  					BMC150_ACCEL_REG_INT_RST_LATCH,
>  					BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_INT |
> @@ -1092,13 +1100,16 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_data_rdy_trig_poll(int irq, void *private)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = private;
>  	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	int i;
>  
>  	data->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns();
>  
> -	if (data->dready_trigger_on)
> -		iio_trigger_poll(data->dready_trig);
> -	else if (data->motion_trigger_on)
> -		iio_trigger_poll(data->motion_trig);
> +	for (i = 0; i < BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS; i++) {
> +		if (data->triggers[i].enabled) {
> +			iio_trigger_poll(data->triggers[i].indio_trig);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	if (data->ev_enable_state)
>  		return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> @@ -1150,6 +1161,71 @@ static int bmc150_accel_gpio_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct {
> +	int intr;
> +	const char *name;
> +	int (*setup)(struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t, bool state);
> +} bmc150_accel_triggers[BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS] = {
> +	{
> +		.intr = 0,
> +		.name = "%s-dev%d",
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.intr = 1,
> +		.name = "%s-any-motion-dev%d",
> +		.setup = bmc150_accel_any_motion_setup,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static void bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> +					     int from)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = from; i >= 0; i++) {
> +		if (data->triggers[i].indio_trig) {
> +			iio_trigger_unregister(data->triggers[i].indio_trig);
> +			data->triggers[i].indio_trig = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int bmc150_accel_triggers_setup(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +				       struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
> +{
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS; i++) {
> +		struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = &data->triggers[i];
> +		const char *name = bmc150_accel_triggers[i].name;
Why bother with this local variable?  Just pass it straight in.

> +		int intr = bmc150_accel_triggers[i].intr;
> +
> +		t->indio_trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&data->client->dev, name,
> +						       indio_dev->name,
> +						       indio_dev->id);
> +		if (!t->indio_trig) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		t->indio_trig->dev.parent = &data->client->dev;
> +		t->indio_trig->ops = &bmc150_accel_trigger_ops;
> +		t->intr = &data->interrupts[intr];
> +		t->data = data;
> +		t->setup = bmc150_accel_triggers[i].setup;
> +		iio_trigger_set_drvdata(t->indio_trig, t);
> +
> +		ret = iio_trigger_register(t->indio_trig);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(data, i - 1);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  			      const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
> @@ -1220,36 +1296,10 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  		bmc150_accel_interrupts_setup(indio_dev, data);
>  
> -		data->dready_trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&client->dev,
> -							   "%s-dev%d",
> -							   indio_dev->name,
> -							   indio_dev->id);
> -		if (!data->dready_trig)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -		data->motion_trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&client->dev,
> -							  "%s-any-motion-dev%d",
> -							  indio_dev->name,
> -							  indio_dev->id);
> -		if (!data->motion_trig)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -		data->dready_trig->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> -		data->dready_trig->ops = &bmc150_accel_trigger_ops;
> -		iio_trigger_set_drvdata(data->dready_trig, indio_dev);
> -		ret = iio_trigger_register(data->dready_trig);
> +		ret = bmc150_accel_triggers_setup(indio_dev, data);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		data->motion_trig->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> -		data->motion_trig->ops = &bmc150_accel_trigger_ops;
> -		iio_trigger_set_drvdata(data->motion_trig, indio_dev);
> -		ret = iio_trigger_register(data->motion_trig);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			data->motion_trig = NULL;
> -			goto err_trigger_unregister;
> -		}
> -
>  		ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev,
>  						 &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
>  						 bmc150_accel_trigger_handler,
> @@ -1281,13 +1331,10 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  err_iio_unregister:
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  err_buffer_cleanup:
> -	if (data->dready_trig)
> +	if (indio_dev->pollfunc)
>  		iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
>  err_trigger_unregister:
> -	if (data->dready_trig)
> -		iio_trigger_unregister(data->dready_trig);
> -	if (data->motion_trig)
> -		iio_trigger_unregister(data->motion_trig);
> +	bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(data, BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS - 1);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1303,11 +1350,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  
> -	if (data->dready_trig) {
> -		iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
> -		iio_trigger_unregister(data->dready_trig);
> -		iio_trigger_unregister(data->motion_trig);
> -	}
> +	bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(data, BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS - 1);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	bmc150_accel_set_mode(data, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_MODE_DEEP_SUSPEND, 0);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-08 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30 23:59 [PATCH v3 0/9] iio: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] iio: buffer: refactor buffer attributes setup Octavian Purdila
2015-02-04 18:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] iio: add watermark logic to iio read and poll Octavian Purdila
2015-02-04 18:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-04 19:29     ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] iio: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2015-02-08 10:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] iio: bmc150: refactor slope duration and threshold update Octavian Purdila
2015-02-05 17:02   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-02-08 10:37     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-09  9:54       ` Octavian Purdila
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] iio: bmc150: refactor interrupt enabling Octavian Purdila
2015-02-05 17:06   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-02-08 10:39     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] iio: bmc150: exit early if event / trigger state is not changed Octavian Purdila
2015-02-05 17:09   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-02-08 10:40     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_interrupt Octavian Purdila
2015-02-08 11:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_trigger Octavian Purdila
2015-02-08 11:07   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2015-02-14  0:03     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-01-31  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] iio: bmc150: add support for hardware fifo Octavian Purdila
2015-02-08 11:26   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D74358.108@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox