linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq"
	<vianney.leclement@essensium.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Meerwald" <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" <arnout@mind.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iio: mlx90614: Support devices with dual IR sensor
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:18:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FDB9CE.2060104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424879712-28304-5-git-send-email-vianney.leclement@essensium.com>

On 25/02/15 15:55, Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq wrote:
> The model is detected by reading the EEPROM configuration during
> probing.  In the dual IR sensor model, the ambient temperature is
> exported twice to userspace.  This makes the two channels appear
> completely symmetrical.
Why do we want it to be symmetrical?  

Is there a part number difference for the dual sensor version?  If so we can still
autoprobe for it, but want to make sure we have it listed as a supported part.

Otherwise one small comment inline.  Ideally I'd like Peter to take a look at this
series as well as he is a lot more familiar with the driver than I am.

Peter, shout if you are snowed under and don't have time!

Jonathan
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq <vianney.leclement@essensium.com>
> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> index d5b41fd..0b36746 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int mlx90614_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			    int *val2, long mask)
>  {
>  	struct mlx90614_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	u8 cmd;
>  	s32 ret;
>  
>  	switch (mask) {
> @@ -67,20 +68,28 @@ static int mlx90614_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
>  		switch (channel->channel2) {
>  		case IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT:
> -			ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client,
> -			    MLX90614_TA);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				return ret;
> +			cmd = MLX90614_TA;
>  			break;
>  		case IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT:
> -			ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client,
> -			    MLX90614_TOBJ1);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				return ret;
> +			switch (channel->channel) {
> +			case 0:
> +				cmd = MLX90614_TOBJ1;
> +				break;
> +			case 1:
> +				cmd = MLX90614_TOBJ2;
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  			break;
>  		default:
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> +
> +		ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client, cmd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
>  		switch (mask) {
>  		case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>  			*val = ret;
> @@ -121,6 +130,28 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec mlx90614_channels[] = {
>  		.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
>  		    BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.type = IIO_TEMP,
> +		.indexed = 1,
> +		.modified = 1,
> +		.channel = 1,
> +		.channel2 = IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT,
> +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> +		    BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> +		    BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.type = IIO_TEMP,
> +		.indexed = 1,
> +		.modified = 1,
> +		.channel = 1,
> +		.channel2 = IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT,
> +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> +		    BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> +		    BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static const struct iio_info mlx90614_info = {
> @@ -128,11 +159,25 @@ static const struct iio_info mlx90614_info = {
>  	.driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +/* Return 0 for single sensor, 1 for dual sensor, <0 on error. */
> +static int mlx90614_probe_model(struct i2c_client *client)
I'd give this a more specific name.  probe_num_ir_sensors or similar.

> +{
> +	s32 ret;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, MLX90614_CONFIG);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return (ret & MLX90614_CONFIG_DUAL_MASK) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int mlx90614_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  			 const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	struct mlx90614_data *data;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -150,8 +195,21 @@ static int mlx90614_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>  	indio_dev->info = &mlx90614_info;
>  
> -	indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> -	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mlx90614_channels);
> +	ret = mlx90614_probe_model(client);
> +	switch (ret) {
> +	case 0:
> +		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Found single sensor");
> +		indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> +		indio_dev->num_channels = 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 1:
> +		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Found dual sensor");
> +		indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> +		indio_dev->num_channels = 4;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	return iio_device_register(indio_dev);
>  }
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-09 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-25 15:55 [PATCH 0/7] iio: mlx90614 enhancements Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] iio: mlx90614: Refactor register symbols Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: mlx90614: Add symbols for accessible registers Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: mlx90614: Add processed temperature output Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 19:27     ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] iio: mlx90614: Support devices with dual IR sensor Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:18   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2015-03-09 19:35     ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] iio: mlx90614: Allow tuning EEPROM configuration Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 15:41     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 16:45       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-09 17:02         ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 17:15           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-09 19:52       ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] iio: mlx90614: Add power management Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 15:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 16:43     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-12 10:30       ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] iio: mlx90614: Provide raw IR value for object channels Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FDB9CE.2060104@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=vianney.leclement@essensium.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).