From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq"
<vianney.leclement@essensium.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Meerwald" <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" <arnout@mind.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iio: mlx90614: Support devices with dual IR sensor
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:18:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FDB9CE.2060104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424879712-28304-5-git-send-email-vianney.leclement@essensium.com>
On 25/02/15 15:55, Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq wrote:
> The model is detected by reading the EEPROM configuration during
> probing. In the dual IR sensor model, the ambient temperature is
> exported twice to userspace. This makes the two channels appear
> completely symmetrical.
Why do we want it to be symmetrical?
Is there a part number difference for the dual sensor version? If so we can still
autoprobe for it, but want to make sure we have it listed as a supported part.
Otherwise one small comment inline. Ideally I'd like Peter to take a look at this
series as well as he is a lot more familiar with the driver than I am.
Peter, shout if you are snowed under and don't have time!
Jonathan
>
> Signed-off-by: Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq <vianney.leclement@essensium.com>
> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> ---
> drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> index d5b41fd..0b36746 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90614.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int mlx90614_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> int *val2, long mask)
> {
> struct mlx90614_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + u8 cmd;
> s32 ret;
>
> switch (mask) {
> @@ -67,20 +68,28 @@ static int mlx90614_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> switch (channel->channel2) {
> case IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT:
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client,
> - MLX90614_TA);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + cmd = MLX90614_TA;
> break;
> case IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT:
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client,
> - MLX90614_TOBJ1);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + switch (channel->channel) {
> + case 0:
> + cmd = MLX90614_TOBJ1;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + cmd = MLX90614_TOBJ2;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client, cmd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> *val = ret;
> @@ -121,6 +130,28 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec mlx90614_channels[] = {
> .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_TEMP,
> + .indexed = 1,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_TEMP_AMBIENT,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> + },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_TEMP,
> + .indexed = 1,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_TEMP_OBJECT,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> + },
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info mlx90614_info = {
> @@ -128,11 +159,25 @@ static const struct iio_info mlx90614_info = {
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +/* Return 0 for single sensor, 1 for dual sensor, <0 on error. */
> +static int mlx90614_probe_model(struct i2c_client *client)
I'd give this a more specific name. probe_num_ir_sensors or similar.
> +{
> + s32 ret;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, MLX90614_CONFIG);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return (ret & MLX90614_CONFIG_DUAL_MASK) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> static int mlx90614_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> struct mlx90614_data *data;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -150,8 +195,21 @@ static int mlx90614_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> indio_dev->info = &mlx90614_info;
>
> - indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> - indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mlx90614_channels);
> + ret = mlx90614_probe_model(client);
> + switch (ret) {
> + case 0:
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Found single sensor");
> + indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = 2;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Found dual sensor");
> + indio_dev->channels = mlx90614_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = 4;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return iio_device_register(indio_dev);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 15:55 [PATCH 0/7] iio: mlx90614 enhancements Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] iio: mlx90614: Refactor register symbols Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: mlx90614: Add symbols for accessible registers Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: mlx90614: Add processed temperature output Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 19:27 ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] iio: mlx90614: Support devices with dual IR sensor Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2015-03-09 19:35 ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] iio: mlx90614: Allow tuning EEPROM configuration Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 15:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 16:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-09 17:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 17:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-09 19:52 ` Vianney le Clément
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] iio: mlx90614: Add power management Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
2015-03-09 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-09 16:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-12 10:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-02-25 15:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] iio: mlx90614: Provide raw IR value for object channels Vianney le Clément de Saint-Marcq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FDB9CE.2060104@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=vianney.leclement@essensium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).