From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: __iio_update_buffers: Leave device in sane state on error
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:48:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5560691D.8040609@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431948889-24069-4-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
On 18/05/15 12:34, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Currently when something goes wrong at some step when disabling the buffers
> we immediately abort. This has the effect that the enable/disable calls are
> no longer balanced. So make sure that even if one step in the disable
> sequence fails the other steps are still executed.
>
> The other issue is that when either enable or disable fails buffers that
> were active at that time stay active while the device itself is disabled.
> This leaves things in a inconsistent state and can cause unbalanced
> enable/disable calls. Furthermore when enable fails we restore the old scan
> mask, but still keeps things disabled.
>
> Given that verification of the configuration was performed earlier and it
> is valid at the point where we try to enable/disable the most likely reason
> of failure is a communication failure with the device or maybe a
> out-of-memory situation. There is not really a good recovery strategy in
> such a case, so it makes sense to leave the device disabled, but we should
> still leave it in a consistent state.
>
> What the patch does if disable/enable fails is to deactivate all buffers
> and make sure that the device will be in the same state as if all buffers
> had been manually disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Applied.
Thanks for doing this Lars. I suspect we have quite a few 'evolved' bits
of rubbish code hiding in there that need this treatment but this was definitely
one of the worst!
I guess I should find some time to clean up the iio_input driver so we actually
have a common usecase for all this complexity.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index b4d7dba..1129125 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,15 @@ static void iio_buffer_deactivate(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> iio_buffer_put(buffer);
> }
>
> +static void iio_buffer_deactivate_all(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer, *_buffer;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(buffer, _buffer,
> + &indio_dev->buffer_list, buffer_list)
> + iio_buffer_deactivate(buffer);
> +}
> +
> static void iio_buffer_update_bytes_per_datum(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> {
> @@ -719,36 +728,46 @@ err_undo_config:
>
> static int iio_disable_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int ret2;
>
> /* Wind down existing buffers - iff there are any */
> if (list_empty(&indio_dev->buffer_list))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * If things go wrong at some step in disable we still need to continue
> + * to perform the other steps, otherwise we leave the device in a
> + * inconsistent state. We return the error code for the first error we
> + * encountered.
> + */
> +
> if (indio_dev->setup_ops->predisable) {
> - ret = indio_dev->setup_ops->predisable(indio_dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + ret2 = indio_dev->setup_ops->predisable(indio_dev);
> + if (ret2 && !ret)
> + ret = ret2;
> }
>
> indio_dev->currentmode = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>
> if (indio_dev->setup_ops->postdisable) {
> - ret = indio_dev->setup_ops->postdisable(indio_dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + ret2 = indio_dev->setup_ops->postdisable(indio_dev);
> + if (ret2 && !ret)
> + ret = ret2;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, indio_dev->active_scan_mask);
> + indio_dev->active_scan_mask = NULL;
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int __iio_update_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_buffer *insert_buffer,
> struct iio_buffer *remove_buffer)
> {
> - int ret;
> - const unsigned long *old_mask;
> struct iio_device_config new_config;
> + int ret;
>
> ret = iio_verify_update(indio_dev, insert_buffer, remove_buffer,
> &new_config);
> @@ -761,15 +780,9 @@ static int __iio_update_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> goto err_free_config;
> }
>
> - /* Keep a copy of current setup to allow roll back */
> - old_mask = indio_dev->active_scan_mask;
> - indio_dev->active_scan_mask = NULL;
> -
> ret = iio_disable_buffers(indio_dev);
> - if (ret) {
> - iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, old_mask);
> - goto err_free_config;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_deactivate_all;
>
> if (remove_buffer)
> iio_buffer_deactivate(remove_buffer);
> @@ -777,22 +790,26 @@ static int __iio_update_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> iio_buffer_activate(indio_dev, insert_buffer);
>
> /* If no buffers in list, we are done */
> - if (list_empty(&indio_dev->buffer_list)) {
> - iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, old_mask);
> + if (list_empty(&indio_dev->buffer_list))
> return 0;
> - }
>
> ret = iio_enable_buffers(indio_dev, &new_config);
> - if (ret) {
> - if (insert_buffer)
> - iio_buffer_deactivate(insert_buffer);
> - indio_dev->active_scan_mask = old_mask;
> - goto err_free_config;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_deactivate_all;
>
> - iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, old_mask);
> return 0;
>
> +err_deactivate_all:
> + /*
> + * We've already verified that the config is valid earlier. If things go
> + * wrong in either enable or disable the most likely reason is an IO
> + * error from the device. In this case there is no good recovery
> + * strategy. Just make sure to disable everything and leave the device
> + * in a sane state. With a bit of luck the device might come back to
> + * life again later and userspace can try again.
> + */
> + iio_buffer_deactivate_all(indio_dev);
> +
> err_free_config:
> iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, new_config.scan_mask);
> return ret;
> @@ -838,15 +855,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_update_buffers);
>
> void iio_disable_all_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer, *_buffer;
> -
> iio_disable_buffers(indio_dev);
> - iio_free_scan_mask(indio_dev, indio_dev->active_scan_mask);
> - indio_dev->active_scan_mask = NULL;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(buffer, _buffer,
> - &indio_dev->buffer_list, buffer_list)
> - iio_buffer_deactivate(buffer);
> + iio_buffer_deactivate_all(indio_dev);
> }
>
> static ssize_t iio_buffer_store_enable(struct device *dev,
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] iio: Refactor __iio_update_buffers() Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-18 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: __iio_update_buffers: Verify configuration before starting to apply it Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-23 11:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-18 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: __iio_update_buffers: Split enable and disable path into helper functions Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-23 11:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-18 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: __iio_update_buffers: Leave device in sane state on error Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-23 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5560691D.8040609@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).