From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: harald@ccbib.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] iio: dht11: Use new function ktime_get_resolution_ns()
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:39:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5592F08E.8000702@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02a909f41c0b1c16251d016d71ac86bc@imap.cosmopool.net>
Am 30.06.2015 um 21:37 schrieb harald@ccbib.org:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:37:22 +0200, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>> Harald Geyer schrieb am 29.06.2015 um 20:59:
>>> Hi Jonathan!
>>>
>>> Jonathan Cameron writes:
> [...]
>>>> Looks good to me. Will wait for comments on the first patch though
>>>> before taking this... clearly that one will need a few acks if I take
>>>> it through IIO!
>>>
>>> The first patch has been merged via tip tree for 4.2 (is already
>>> available
>>> in staging-next tree). Are you going to pick up this patch or do I need
>>> to resend?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harald
>>>
>>
>> Hi Harald,
>> there are a few small style issues, which checkpatch.pl --strict should
>> show you.
>
> Thanks for pointing out --strict - didn't know about that yet.
Don't take checkpatch.pl too seriously.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 11:12 [PATCHv2 0/2] Provide new API to get the current time resolution Harald Geyer
2015-04-07 11:12 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] timekeeping: " Harald Geyer
2015-04-07 22:30 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-08 7:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-07 11:12 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] iio: dht11: Use new function ktime_get_resolution_ns() Harald Geyer
2015-04-09 13:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-06-29 18:59 ` Harald Geyer
2015-06-29 19:37 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-30 19:37 ` harald
2015-06-30 19:39 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-07-01 19:04 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-05 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-06 15:06 ` harald
2015-07-07 13:39 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] iio: dht11: whitespace changes to make checkpatch.pl --strict happy Harald Geyer
2015-07-07 13:39 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] iio: dht11: add comment " Harald Geyer
2015-07-19 13:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-07 13:39 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] iio: dht11: avoid multiple assignments " Harald Geyer
2015-07-19 13:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-07 13:39 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] iio: dht11: Use new function ktime_get_resolution_ns() Harald Geyer
2015-07-19 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-19 13:04 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] iio: dht11: whitespace changes to make checkpatch.pl --strict happy Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5592F08E.8000702@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=harald@ccbib.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).