From: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
To: "Breana, Tiberiu A" <tiberiu.a.breana@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559EB46B.8060104@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4586F61A4A291F4DA44D32824E7C0F402216D8AA@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Breana, Tiberiu A schrieb am 06.07.2015 um 11:30:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:jic23@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2015 2:25 PM
>> To: Hartmut Knaack; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen; Peter Meerwald; Breana, Tiberiu A
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling
>>
>> On 04/07/15 16:56, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>>> Check for the following error cases:
>>> * lower boundary for val in _write_event
>>> * return value of regmap_(field_)read
>>> * possible values for chan->type
>>> * return value of stk3310_gpio_probe
>>>
>>> Also add an error-cleanup path in _probe to handle failure in
>>> iio_device_register and devm_request_threaded_irq.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>> I'm not sure how I missed this before, but the probe order below is rather
>> unusual. I'm a little bothered by the theoretical race condition between the
>> exposure of the device to userspace
>> (device_register) and the configuration of it's irq later.
>>
>> It is probably possible (in theory) to enable an event before the irq is
>> registered and get the event to fire, resulting in an unhandled interrupt.
>>
>> I'm going to hold back on the rest of this set until Tiberiu has had a chance to
>> comment on them anyway.
>>
>> Jonathan
>
> Agreed, the probe order needs to be changed. Some comments below.
>
> Tiberiu
>
<...>
>>> -611,11 +631,14 @@ static int stk3310_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "device_register failed\n");
>>> - stk3310_set_state(data, STK3310_STATE_STANDBY);
>>> + goto err_standby;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (client->irq <= 0)
>>> + if (client->irq <= 0) {
>
> Sort of unrelated to your patch, but I think this should be (client->irq < 0)
> I would appreciate it if you would include it in your next patch set :)
>
No problem, this will be included in my new revision.
>>> client->irq = stk3310_gpio_probe(client);
>>> + if (client->irq < 0)
>>> + goto err_unregister;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> if (client->irq >= 0) {
>>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq,
>> @@
>>> -624,11 +647,20 @@ static int stk3310_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>>> IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>> STK3310_EVENT, indio_dev);
>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> dev_err(&client->dev, "request irq %d failed\n",
>>> client->irq);
>>> + goto err_unregister;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_unregister:
>>> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>> This made me nervous, as there is a very good reason the register is almost
>> always last in the probe function. It exposes the interfaces to userspace (and
>> in kernel for that matter). Everything must be ready before it is called. Here
>> we could (though unlikely) get an unhandled interrupt as the handler has not
>> been registered as yet.
>
> The iio_device_register block should indeed be moved to the end of _probe.
>
>>> +err_standby:
>>> + stk3310_set_state(data, STK3310_STATE_STANDBY);
>>> +
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-04 15:56 [PATCH 0/5] stk3310 fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] iio:light:stk3310: Fix REGMAP_I2C dependency Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-05 11:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio:light:stk3310: make endianness independent of host Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06 9:05 ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-05 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-06 9:30 ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-09 17:50 ` Hartmut Knaack [this message]
2015-07-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio:light:stk3310: use correct names and type for state Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06 9:33 ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio:light:stk3310: adjust indentation Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06 9:34 ` Breana, Tiberiu A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559EB46B.8060104@gmx.de \
--to=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=tiberiu.a.breana@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox