From: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
To: Nicola Corna <nicola@corna.info>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio:humidity:si7020: replaced bitmask on humidity values with range check
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:54:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D8EF99.5080305@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D8ED25.4040409@gmx.de>
Hartmut Knaack schrieb am 22.08.2015 um 23:44:
> Nicola Corna schrieb am 22.08.2015 um 20:01:
>> The maximum possible value for the relative humidity is 55575 (100%RH).
>> This value, if shifted right by 2 bits, uses 14 bits and masking it with
>> a 12 bit mask removes 2 meaningful bits.
>> The masking has been replaced with a range check that sets the minimum
>> value at 786 (0%RH) and the maximum at 13894 (100%RH).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicola Corna <nicola@corna.info>
>
> Might be discussable, if we want the upper boundary to be rounded down,
> so we just barely reach 100% rather than slightly exceeding it (in numbers,
> that is 99,998 vs 100,006). Using 13893 might be the better value. Other
> than that (and a typo in the comment) looking good, so:
> Reviewed-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
On second thought, this is not exactly how clamp_val works. It will return
a value between the boundaries, so usage is like this:
*val = clamp_val(*val, 786, 13894)
If my suggestions are addressed, you can keep my Reviewed-by tag.
Thanks,
Hartmut
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>> index fa3b809..d27e2f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>> @@ -57,8 +57,12 @@ static int si7020_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> *val = ret >> 2;
>> + /*
>> + * Humidity values can sligthly exceed the 0-100%RH
>
> Typo: slightly
>
>> + * range and should be corrected by software
>> + */
>> if (chan->type == IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE)
>> - *val &= GENMASK(11, 0);
>> + clamp_val(*val, 786, 13894);
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP)
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-22 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-22 18:01 [PATCH v2 1/2] iio:humidity:si7020: replaced bitmask on humidity values with range check Nicola Corna
2015-08-22 21:44 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-08-22 21:54 ` Hartmut Knaack [this message]
2015-08-23 7:41 ` Nicola Corna
2015-08-23 11:54 ` Hartmut Knaack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D8EF99.5080305@gmx.de \
--to=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicola@corna.info \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox