From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Giuseppe Barba <giuseppe.barba@st.com>,
Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] iio: st_sensors: support active-low interrupts
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:36:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5692505C.7090008@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56913B86.5040700@kernel.org>
On 09/01/16 16:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 05/01/16 15:18, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On 19/11/15 09:15, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> Most ST MEMS Sensors that support interrupts can also handle sending
>>>> an active low interrupt, i.e. going from high to low on data ready
>>>> (or other interrupt) and thus triggering on a falling edge to the
>>>> interrupt controller.
>>>>
>>>> Set up logic to inspect the interrupt line we get for a sensor: if
>>>> it is triggering on rising edge, leave everything alone, but if it
>>>> triggers on falling edges, set up active low, and if unsupported
>>>> configurations appear: warn with errors and reconfigure the interrupt
>>>> to a rising edge, which all interrupt generating sensors support.
>>>>
>>>> Create a local header for st_sensors_core.h to share functions
>>>> between the sensor core and the trigger setup code.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Giuseppe Barba <giuseppe.barba@st.com>
>>>> Cc: Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@st.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Looks good to me. Ideally I'd like ack from Denis.
>>> (it's early in the cycle so plenty of time for this one!)
>>
>> Has this fallen off the table?
> oops. Yes it has indeed. I still had it marked as outstanding
> but it had drifted too many pages up in my patch list to get
> noticed. Good thing you are keeping track!
>> I think this patch 1/2 is fine
>> to merge as-is, I guess it is too late for v4.5 now, but
>> please queue it for the next cycle.
> It was a little interesting to apply so could you take
> a look at my testing branch and check I didn't mess it up.
> Needed a fair bit of hand resolution though I think it was
> all just fuzz really.
Oops, failed to add the new header. Now fixed in testing.
Jonathan
>
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out
> as testing.
>
> Jonathan
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-10 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 9:15 [PATCH 1/2 v3] iio: st_sensors: support active-low interrupts Linus Walleij
2015-11-22 12:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-05 15:18 ` Linus Walleij
2016-01-09 16:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-10 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5692505C.7090008@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
--cc=giuseppe.barba@st.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).