From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: chemical: atlas-ph-sensor: switch regmap cache
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:02:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C096F3.9070908@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455412842-750-1-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com>
On 14/02/16 01:20, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> switch from using REGCACHE_FLAT to REGCACHE_RBTREE so initial hw values
> are read from device. This also allows some volatile ranges to be
> dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
I'm lost here. Why should changing the storage of the register cache result
in different behaviour other than in efficiency of access to cached values?
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/chemical/atlas-ph-sensor.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/atlas-ph-sensor.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/atlas-ph-sensor.c
> index 06cd49c..71c8e02 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/atlas-ph-sensor.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/atlas-ph-sensor.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ struct atlas_data {
>
> static const struct regmap_range atlas_volatile_ranges[] = {
> regmap_reg_range(ATLAS_REG_INT_CONTROL, ATLAS_REG_INT_CONTROL),
> - regmap_reg_range(ATLAS_REG_CALIB_STATUS, ATLAS_REG_CALIB_STATUS),
> - regmap_reg_range(ATLAS_REG_TEMP_DATA, ATLAS_REG_TEMP_DATA + 4),
> regmap_reg_range(ATLAS_REG_PH_DATA, ATLAS_REG_PH_DATA + 4),
> };
>
> @@ -83,7 +81,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config atlas_regmap_config = {
>
> .volatile_table = &atlas_volatile_table,
> .max_register = ATLAS_REG_PH_DATA + 4,
> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_FLAT,
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> };
>
> static const struct iio_chan_spec atlas_channels[] = {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-14 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 1:20 [PATCH] iio: chemical: atlas-ph-sensor: switch regmap cache Matt Ranostay
2016-02-14 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2016-02-14 17:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2016-02-14 19:52 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-02-15 15:02 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-17 21:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-02-17 21:44 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-02-19 18:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C096F3.9070908@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mranostay@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).