From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:44238 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753460AbcDJO36 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:29:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: st_sensors: read each channel individually To: Linus Walleij References: <1458825486-17188-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <1458825486-17188-2-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <56F8E550.6040305@kernel.org> Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Giuseppe Barba , Denis Ciocca From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <570A6364.4070600@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:29:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 29/03/16 09:15, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> I'd just like to know if this is a fix that needs to go upstream faster >>> than the open drain support or not. > (...) >> >> It *might* be that LIS331DL needs this to even work properly :/ > > I tested on a second board today, which has *only* the LIS331DL > mounted, on an active-high line. > > It has the same problem, and this commit fixes it. > > So there are sensors out there that doesn't work well > with the bulk read optimization. > > I think this patch should be applied for fixes, tell me if > you need it rebased as the first patch (though I think it > will just apply). > > Giuseppe/Denis? Agree? Anyone want to comment on this? J > > Yours, > Linus Walleij >