From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <570FF70F.3000501@denx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:01:19 +0200 From: Marek Vasut MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Wahren , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler CC: Ksenija Stanojevic , Fabio Estevam , Juergen Borleis , Alexandre Belloni , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/5] iio: mxs-lradc: fix memory leak References: <1460648909-2657-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <1460648909-2657-2-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> In-Reply-To: <1460648909-2657-2-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 04/14/2016 05:48 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > After successful touchscreen registration the input device was > never freed. So fix this issue by using devm_input_allocate_device(). > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren > --- > drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > index 33051b8..0576953 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > @@ -1109,12 +1109,11 @@ static int mxs_lradc_ts_register(struct mxs_lradc *lradc) > { > struct input_dev *input; > struct device *dev = lradc->dev; > - int ret; > > if (!lradc->use_touchscreen) > return 0; > > - input = input_allocate_device(); > + input = devm_input_allocate_device(dev); > if (!input) > return -ENOMEM; > > @@ -1134,11 +1133,8 @@ static int mxs_lradc_ts_register(struct mxs_lradc *lradc) > > lradc->ts_input = input; > input_set_drvdata(input, lradc); > - ret = input_register_device(input); > - if (ret) > - input_free_device(lradc->ts_input); > > - return ret; > + return input_register_device(input); > } > > static void mxs_lradc_ts_unregister(struct mxs_lradc *lradc) > Nice find. Looks like at91_adc.c and exynos_adc.c suffer from the exact same issue. The leak looks a bit more severe on exynos even, exynos_adc_ts_init() could use a proper fail path. Do you want to send patches or shall I ? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut