Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iio: trigger: warn about non-registered iio trigger getting attempt
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:09:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b808f06ba7532bbfd9c2745420aedfa9464a297.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220601103356.xlimabcihaay5jky@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>

On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 10:33 +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> Hi Nuno,
> 
> Thank you for comments!
> 
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:47:54AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 18:57 +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > 
> > > I have one question about a cases when trigger owner is builtin
> > > module.
> > > In the such cases trig->owner == null, because THIS_MODULE equals
> > > to
> > > null. How do you think, should we take into account such
> > > situations?
> > > 
> > > IMHO we have to take in and save this information to trig_info
> > > during
> > > trigger allocation call. For example we can check THIS_MODULE
> > > from
> > > the
> > 
> > Hmmm, If we were to do something during iio_trigger_alloc(), we
> > would
> > rather assign already THIS_MODULE to owner and we would not need
> > this
> > WARN(). I mean, if someone calls iio_trigger_get() before
> > allocating
> > it, it will have bigger problems :).
> > 
> 
> You are right, non-allocated pointer dereference is much bigger
> problem :)
> 
> > I think this could actually be something reasonable...
> 
> I think it could be a good solution, but it's required a lot of
> changes
> in the IIO drivers code, because if we assign trig->owner from
> iio_trigger_alloc(), we do not need this_mod parameter in the
> iio_trigger_register() iface and its wrappers.
> So it means to make it workable we must:
>     - rework iio_trigger_alloc()
>     - redesign iio_trigger_register() iface and its wrappers
>     - correct iio_trigger_register() call from all IIO drivers
> 
> I suppose we need to wait for Jonathan's comments here...
> 

I think we could actually get this done without having to change all
the drivers. Note on how iio_trigger_register() passes THIS_MODULE to
the internal API. We could also use macros in the alloc function in a
way that only internal functions would need to be changed. But it all
depends on whether or not Jonathan wants this moved...

- Nuno Sá

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 18:15 [PATCH v1] iio: trigger: warn about non-registered iio trigger getting attempt Dmitry Rokosov
2022-05-31 18:57 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-06-01  8:47   ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-01 10:33     ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-06-01 13:09       ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2022-06-01 18:03         ` Dmitry Rokosov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b808f06ba7532bbfd9c2745420aedfa9464a297.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox