[PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Philipp Jungkamp]

Hello,

I'm sorry for the confusion caused by me sending revisions as replies.
I've now addresses the points raised. As I'm unfamiliar with mailing lists
any recommendation on making the process more seamless is welcome.

Thank you for your time!

v2:
- Patch 1/4:
  - Remove unnecessary comments.
  - Change return type of functions to bool. (introduced an error, fixed in v4)
  - Swallows return value of a function. (fixed in v4)
- Patch 2/4:
  - Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the custom
    sensor match table.
- Patch 3/4:
  - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
- Patch 4/4:
  - Allow for 1 byte human presence reports.

v3:
- Patch 2/4
  - Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'

v4:
- Patch 1/4:
  - Fix return value and error codes on property query.
  - Document and ignore return values for queries of optionally matched
    properties.
  - Don't modify *known in _get_known, return error when not matched.
  - Remove comment on newly added sensors from commit message.
- Patch 4/4:
  - Clean up switch statement.

Regards,
Philipp Jungkamp

Philipp Jungkamp (4):
  HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors
  HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors
  IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage
  IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage

 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c     | 233 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c  |  27 ++--
 drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c |  37 +++--
 include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h      |   1 +
 4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

--
2.38.1

[PATCH v4 1/4] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors

[Philipp Jungkamp]

The known LUID table for established/known custom HID sensors was
limited to sensors with "INTEL" as manufacturer. But some vendors such
as Lenovo also include fairly standard iio sensors (e.g. ambient light)
in their custom sensors.

Expand the known custom sensors table by a tag used for the platform
device name and match sensors based on the LUID as well as optionally
on model and manufacturer properties.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
---

v2:
- Remove unnecessary comments.
- Change return type of functions to bool. (introduced an error, fixed in v4)
- Swallows return value of a function. (fixed in v4)

v3:
- No change.

v4:
- Fix return value and error codes on property query.
- Document and ignore return values for queries of optionally matched
  properties.
- Don't modify *known in _get_known, return error when not matched.
- Remove comment on newly added sensors from commit message.


 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h  |   1 +
 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 32c2306e240d..734c6bde68fe 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  */

 #include <linux/ctype.h>
+#include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -750,114 +751,179 @@ static void hid_sensor_custom_dev_if_remove(struct hid_sensor_custom

 }

-/* luid defined in FW (e.g. ISH).  Maybe used to identify sensor. */
-static const char *const known_sensor_luid[] = { "020B000000000000" };
+/*
+ * Match a known custom sensor.
+ * tag and luid is mandatory.
+ */
+struct hid_sensor_custom_match {
+	const char *tag;
+	const char *luid;
+	const char *model;
+	const char *manufacturer;
+	bool check_dmi;
+	struct dmi_system_id dmi;
+};

-static int get_luid_table_index(unsigned char *usage_str)
-{
-	int i;
+/*
+ * Custom sensor properties used for matching.
+ */
+struct hid_sensor_custom_properties {
+	u16 serial_num[HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES];
+	u16 model[HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES];
+	u16 manufacturer[HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES];
+};

-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(known_sensor_luid); i++) {
-		if (!strncmp(usage_str, known_sensor_luid[i],
-			     strlen(known_sensor_luid[i])))
-			return i;
+static const struct hid_sensor_custom_match hid_sensor_custom_known_table[] = {
+	/*
+	 * Intel Integrated Sensor Hub (ISH)
+	 */
+	{	/* Intel ISH hinge */
+		.tag = "INT",
+		.luid = "020B000000000000",
+		.manufacturer = "INTEL",
+	},
+	{}
+};
+
+static bool hid_sensor_custom_prop_match_str(const u16 *prop, const char *match,
+					     size_t count)
+{
+	while (count-- && *prop && *match) {
+		if (*prop != (u16) *match)
+			return false;
+		prop++;
+		match++;
 	}

-	return -ENODEV;
+	return (count == -1) || *prop == (u16)*match;
 }

-static int get_known_custom_sensor_index(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev)
+static int hid_sensor_custom_get_prop(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
+				      u32 prop_usage_id, size_t prop_size,
+				      u16 *prop)
 {
-	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info sensor_manufacturer = { 0 };
-	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info sensor_luid_info = { 0 };
-	int report_size;
+	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info prop_attr = { 0 };
 	int ret;
-	static u16 w_buf[HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES];
-	static char buf[HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES];
-	int i;

-	memset(w_buf, 0, sizeof(w_buf));
-	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+	memset(prop, 0, prop_size);

-	/* get manufacturer info */
-	ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(hsdev,
-			HID_FEATURE_REPORT, hsdev->usage,
-			HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_MANUFACTURER, &sensor_manufacturer);
+	ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(hsdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT,
+						  hsdev->usage, prop_usage_id,
+						  &prop_attr);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;

-	report_size =
-		sensor_hub_get_feature(hsdev, sensor_manufacturer.report_id,
-				       sensor_manufacturer.index, sizeof(w_buf),
-				       w_buf);
-	if (report_size <= 0) {
-		hid_err(hsdev->hdev,
-			"Failed to get sensor manufacturer info %d\n",
-			report_size);
-		return -ENODEV;
+	ret = sensor_hub_get_feature(hsdev, prop_attr.report_id,
+				     prop_attr.index, prop_size, prop);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		hid_err(hsdev->hdev, "Failed to get sensor property %08x %d\n",
+			prop_usage_id, ret);
+		return ret;
 	}

-	/* convert from wide char to char */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(buf) - 1 && w_buf[i]; i++)
-		buf[i] = (char)w_buf[i];
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool
+hid_sensor_custom_do_match(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
+			   const struct hid_sensor_custom_match *match,
+			   const struct hid_sensor_custom_properties *prop)
+{
+	struct dmi_system_id dmi[] = { match->dmi, { 0 } };
+
+	if (!hid_sensor_custom_prop_match_str(prop->serial_num, "LUID:", 5) ||
+	    !hid_sensor_custom_prop_match_str(prop->serial_num + 5, match->luid,
+					      HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES - 5))
+		return false;
+
+	if (match->model &&
+	    !hid_sensor_custom_prop_match_str(prop->model, match->model,
+					      HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES))
+		return false;
+
+	if (match->manufacturer &&
+	    !hid_sensor_custom_prop_match_str(prop->manufacturer, match->manufacturer,
+					      HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES))
+		return false;

-	/* ensure it's ISH sensor */
-	if (strncmp(buf, "INTEL", strlen("INTEL")))
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (match->check_dmi && !dmi_check_system(dmi))
+		return false;

-	memset(w_buf, 0, sizeof(w_buf));
-	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+	return true;
+}

-	/* get real usage id */
-	ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(hsdev,
-			HID_FEATURE_REPORT, hsdev->usage,
-			HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_SERIAL_NUM, &sensor_luid_info);
+static int
+hid_sensor_custom_properties_get(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
+				 struct hid_sensor_custom_properties *prop)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = hid_sensor_custom_get_prop(hsdev,
+					 HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_SERIAL_NUM,
+					 HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES,
+					 prop->serial_num);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;

-	report_size = sensor_hub_get_feature(hsdev, sensor_luid_info.report_id,
-					     sensor_luid_info.index, sizeof(w_buf),
-					     w_buf);
-	if (report_size <= 0) {
-		hid_err(hsdev->hdev, "Failed to get real usage info %d\n",
-			report_size);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Ignore errors on the following model and manufacturer properties.
+	 * Because these are optional, it is not an error if they are missing.
+	 */
+
+	hid_sensor_custom_get_prop(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_MODEL,
+				   HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES,
+				   prop->model);

-	/* convert from wide char to char */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(buf) - 1 && w_buf[i]; i++)
-		buf[i] = (char)w_buf[i];
+	hid_sensor_custom_get_prop(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_MANUFACTURER,
+				   HID_CUSTOM_MAX_FEATURE_BYTES,
+				   prop->manufacturer);

-	if (strlen(buf) != strlen(known_sensor_luid[0]) + 5) {
-		hid_err(hsdev->hdev,
-			"%s luid length not match %zu != (%zu + 5)\n", __func__,
-			strlen(buf), strlen(known_sensor_luid[0]));
-		return -ENODEV;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+hid_sensor_custom_get_known(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
+			    const struct hid_sensor_custom_match **known)
+{
+	int ret;
+	const struct hid_sensor_custom_match *match =
+		hid_sensor_custom_known_table;
+	struct hid_sensor_custom_properties prop;
+
+	ret = hid_sensor_custom_properties_get(hsdev, &prop);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	while (match->tag) {
+		if (hid_sensor_custom_do_match(hsdev, match, &prop)) {
+			*known = match;
+			return 0;
+		}
+		match++;
 	}

-	/* get table index with luid (not matching 'LUID: ' in luid) */
-	return get_luid_table_index(&buf[5]);
+	return -ENODATA;
 }

 static struct platform_device *
 hid_sensor_register_platform_device(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				    struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
-				    int index)
+				    const struct hid_sensor_custom_match *match)
 {
-	char real_usage[HID_SENSOR_USAGE_LENGTH] = { 0 };
+	char real_usage[HID_SENSOR_USAGE_LENGTH];
 	struct platform_device *custom_pdev;
 	const char *dev_name;
 	char *c;

-	/* copy real usage id */
-	memcpy(real_usage, known_sensor_luid[index], 4);
+	memcpy(real_usage, match->luid, 4);

 	/* usage id are all lowcase */
 	for (c = real_usage; *c != '\0'; c++)
 		*c = tolower(*c);

-	/* HID-SENSOR-INT-REAL_USAGE_ID */
-	dev_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "HID-SENSOR-INT-%s", real_usage);
+	/* HID-SENSOR-TAG-REAL_USAGE_ID */
+	dev_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "HID-SENSOR-%s-%s",
+			     match->tag, real_usage);
 	if (!dev_name)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

@@ -873,7 +939,7 @@ static int hid_sensor_custom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct hid_sensor_custom *sensor_inst;
 	struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
 	int ret;
-	int index;
+	const struct hid_sensor_custom_match *match;

 	sensor_inst = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sensor_inst),
 				   GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -888,10 +954,10 @@ static int hid_sensor_custom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	mutex_init(&sensor_inst->mutex);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sensor_inst);

-	index = get_known_custom_sensor_index(hsdev);
-	if (index >= 0 && index < ARRAY_SIZE(known_sensor_luid)) {
+	ret = hid_sensor_custom_get_known(hsdev, &match);
+	if (!ret) {
 		sensor_inst->custom_pdev =
-			hid_sensor_register_platform_device(pdev, hsdev, index);
+			hid_sensor_register_platform_device(pdev, hsdev, match);

 		ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sensor_inst->custom_pdev);
 		if (ret) {
diff --git a/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h b/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h
index ac631159403a..13b1e65fbdcc 100644
--- a/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_FRIENDLY_NAME			0x200301
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_SERIAL_NUM			0x200307
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_MANUFACTURER			0x200305
+#define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_MODEL				0x200306
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_REPORT_INTERVAL			0x20030E
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_SENSITIVITY_ABS			0x20030F
 #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROP_SENSITIVITY_RANGE_PCT		0x200310
--
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:38:38 +0100
Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net> wrote:

> The known LUID table for established/known custom HID sensors was
> limited to sensors with "INTEL" as manufacturer. But some vendors such
> as Lenovo also include fairly standard iio sensors (e.g. ambient light)
> in their custom sensors.
> 
> Expand the known custom sensors table by a tag used for the platform
> device name and match sensors based on the LUID as well as optionally
> on model and manufacturer properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

[PATCH v4 2/4] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors

[Philipp Jungkamp]

Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) custom sensors to the
known custom sensors.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
---

v2:
- Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the custom
  sensor match table.

v3:
- Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'

v4:
- No change.

 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 734c6bde68fe..7c6e2e795753 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -782,6 +782,29 @@ static const struct hid_sensor_custom_match hid_sensor_custom_known_table[] = {
 		.luid = "020B000000000000",
 		.manufacturer = "INTEL",
 	},
+	/*
+	 * Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS)
+	 */
+	{	/* ambient light */
+		.tag = "LISS",
+		.luid = "0041010200000082",
+		.model = "STK3X3X Sensor",
+		.manufacturer = "Vendor 258",
+		.check_dmi = true,
+		.dmi.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
+		}
+	},
+	{	/* human presence */
+		.tag = "LISS",
+		.luid = "0226000171AC0081",
+		.model = "VL53L1_HOD Sensor",
+		.manufacturer = "ST_MICRO",
+		.check_dmi = true,
+		.dmi.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
+		}
+	},
 	{}
 };

--
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:38:39 +0100
Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net> wrote:

> Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) custom sensors to the
> known custom sensors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
Obviously not much to actually review here, beyond 'it looks plausible'.
FWIW

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
> 
> v2:
> - Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the custom
>   sensor match table.
> 
> v3:
> - Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'
> 
> v4:
> - No change.
> 
>  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> index 734c6bde68fe..7c6e2e795753 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,29 @@ static const struct hid_sensor_custom_match hid_sensor_custom_known_table[] = {
>  		.luid = "020B000000000000",
>  		.manufacturer = "INTEL",
>  	},
> +	/*
> +	 * Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS)
> +	 */
> +	{	/* ambient light */
> +		.tag = "LISS",
> +		.luid = "0041010200000082",
> +		.model = "STK3X3X Sensor",
> +		.manufacturer = "Vendor 258",
> +		.check_dmi = true,
> +		.dmi.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
> +		}
> +	},
> +	{	/* human presence */
> +		.tag = "LISS",
> +		.luid = "0226000171AC0081",
> +		.model = "VL53L1_HOD Sensor",
> +		.manufacturer = "ST_MICRO",
> +		.check_dmi = true,
> +		.dmi.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
> +		}
> +	},
>  	{}
>  };
> 
> --
> 2.38.1
> 

[PATCH v4 3/4] IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage

[Philipp Jungkamp]

Use a generic 'hsdev->usage' instead of the HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS to
allow this driver to drive the Lenovo custom ambient light sensor,
which is registered under a 'custom' usage and not HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS.

Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) ambient light sensor
to the platform device ids.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
---

v2:
- Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.

v3:
- No change.

v4:
- No change.

 drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
index 5a1a625d8d16..eb1aedad7edc 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			      long mask)
 {
 	struct als_state *als_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+	struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = als_state->common_attributes.hsdev;
 	int report_id = -1;
 	u32 address;
 	int ret_type;
@@ -110,11 +111,8 @@ static int als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			hid_sensor_power_state(&als_state->common_attributes,
 						true);
 			*val = sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(
-					als_state->common_attributes.hsdev,
-					HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS, address,
-					report_id,
-					SENSOR_HUB_SYNC,
-					min < 0);
+					hsdev, hsdev->usage, address, report_id,
+					SENSOR_HUB_SYNC, min < 0);
 			hid_sensor_power_state(&als_state->common_attributes,
 						false);
 		} else {
@@ -259,9 +257,7 @@ static int als_parse_report(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "als %x:%x\n", st->als_illum.index,
 			st->als_illum.report_id);

-	st->scale_precision = hid_sensor_format_scale(
-				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
-				&st->als_illum,
+	st->scale_precision = hid_sensor_format_scale(usage_id, &st->als_illum,
 				&st->scale_pre_decml, &st->scale_post_decml);

 	return ret;
@@ -285,7 +281,8 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	als_state->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev;
 	als_state->common_attributes.pdev = pdev;

-	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
+	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev,
+					hsdev->usage,
 					&als_state->common_attributes,
 					als_sensitivity_addresses,
 					ARRAY_SIZE(als_sensitivity_addresses));
@@ -303,7 +300,8 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

 	ret = als_parse_report(pdev, hsdev,
 			       (struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels,
-			       HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS, als_state);
+			       hsdev->usage,
+			       als_state);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -333,8 +331,7 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	als_state->callbacks.send_event = als_proc_event;
 	als_state->callbacks.capture_sample = als_capture_sample;
 	als_state->callbacks.pdev = pdev;
-	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
-					&als_state->callbacks);
+	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage, &als_state->callbacks);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n");
 		goto error_iio_unreg;
@@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ static int hid_als_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct als_state *als_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);

-	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS);
+	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
 	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
 	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &als_state->common_attributes);

@@ -368,6 +365,10 @@ static const struct platform_device_id hid_als_ids[] = {
 		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
 		.name = "HID-SENSOR-200041",
 	},
+	{
+		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-custom_sensor_tag-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
+		.name = "HID-SENSOR-LISS-0041",
+	},
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_als_ids);
--
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:38:40 +0100
Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net> wrote:

> Use a generic 'hsdev->usage' instead of the HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS to
> allow this driver to drive the Lenovo custom ambient light sensor,
> which is registered under a 'custom' usage and not HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS.
> 
> Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) ambient light sensor
> to the platform device ids.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
Again, please pick up tags given when posting new versions.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
> 
> v2:
> - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
> 
> v3:
> - No change.
> 
> v4:
> - No change.
> 
>  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> index 5a1a625d8d16..eb1aedad7edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			      long mask)
>  {
>  	struct als_state *als_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = als_state->common_attributes.hsdev;
>  	int report_id = -1;
>  	u32 address;
>  	int ret_type;
> @@ -110,11 +111,8 @@ static int als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			hid_sensor_power_state(&als_state->common_attributes,
>  						true);
>  			*val = sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(
> -					als_state->common_attributes.hsdev,
> -					HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS, address,
> -					report_id,
> -					SENSOR_HUB_SYNC,
> -					min < 0);
> +					hsdev, hsdev->usage, address, report_id,
> +					SENSOR_HUB_SYNC, min < 0);
>  			hid_sensor_power_state(&als_state->common_attributes,
>  						false);
>  		} else {
> @@ -259,9 +257,7 @@ static int als_parse_report(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "als %x:%x\n", st->als_illum.index,
>  			st->als_illum.report_id);
> 
> -	st->scale_precision = hid_sensor_format_scale(
> -				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
> -				&st->als_illum,
> +	st->scale_precision = hid_sensor_format_scale(usage_id, &st->als_illum,
>  				&st->scale_pre_decml, &st->scale_post_decml);
> 
>  	return ret;
> @@ -285,7 +281,8 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	als_state->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev;
>  	als_state->common_attributes.pdev = pdev;
> 
> -	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
> +	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev,
> +					hsdev->usage,
>  					&als_state->common_attributes,
>  					als_sensitivity_addresses,
>  					ARRAY_SIZE(als_sensitivity_addresses));
> @@ -303,7 +300,8 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>  	ret = als_parse_report(pdev, hsdev,
>  			       (struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels,
> -			       HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS, als_state);
> +			       hsdev->usage,
> +			       als_state);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -333,8 +331,7 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	als_state->callbacks.send_event = als_proc_event;
>  	als_state->callbacks.capture_sample = als_capture_sample;
>  	als_state->callbacks.pdev = pdev;
> -	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS,
> -					&als_state->callbacks);
> +	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage, &als_state->callbacks);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n");
>  		goto error_iio_unreg;
> @@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ static int hid_als_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct als_state *als_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> 
> -	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ALS);
> +	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &als_state->common_attributes);
> 
> @@ -368,6 +365,10 @@ static const struct platform_device_id hid_als_ids[] = {
>  		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
>  		.name = "HID-SENSOR-200041",
>  	},
> +	{
> +		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-custom_sensor_tag-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
> +		.name = "HID-SENSOR-LISS-0041",
> +	},
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_als_ids);
> --
> 2.38.1
> 

[PATCH v4 4/4] IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage

[Philipp Jungkamp]

Use a generic 'hsdev->usage' instead of the HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX to
allow this driver to drive the Lenvo custom proximity sensor, which is
registered under a 'custom' usage and not HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX.

Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) human presence sensor
to the platform device ids.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>
---

v2:
- Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.

v3:
- No change.

v4:
- Clean up switch statement.

 drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
index f10fa2abfe72..a47591e1bad9 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			      long mask)
 {
 	struct prox_state *prox_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+	struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev;
 	int report_id = -1;
 	u32 address;
 	int ret_type;
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			report_id = prox_state->prox_attr.report_id;
 			min = prox_state->prox_attr.logical_minimum;
 			address = HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMAN_PRESENCE;
+			hsdev = prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev;
 			break;
 		default:
 			report_id = -1;
@@ -84,11 +86,8 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			hid_sensor_power_state(&prox_state->common_attributes,
 						true);
 			*val = sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(
-				prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev,
-				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX, address,
-				report_id,
-				SENSOR_HUB_SYNC,
-				min < 0);
+				hsdev, hsdev->usage, address, report_id,
+				SENSOR_HUB_SYNC, min < 0);
 			hid_sensor_power_state(&prox_state->common_attributes,
 						false);
 		} else {
@@ -191,10 +190,16 @@ static int prox_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,

 	switch (usage_id) {
 	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMAN_PRESENCE:
-		prox_state->human_presence = *(u32 *)raw_data;
-		ret = 0;
-		break;
-	default:
+		switch (raw_len) {
+		case 1:
+			prox_state->human_presence = *(u8 *)raw_data;
+			return 0;
+		case 4:
+			prox_state->human_presence = *(u32 *)raw_data;
+			return 0;
+		default:
+			break;
+		}
 		break;
 	}

@@ -244,7 +249,7 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev;
 	prox_state->common_attributes.pdev = pdev;

-	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX,
+	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
 					&prox_state->common_attributes,
 					prox_sensitivity_addresses,
 					ARRAY_SIZE(prox_sensitivity_addresses));
@@ -262,7 +267,7 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

 	ret = prox_parse_report(pdev, hsdev,
 				(struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels,
-				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX, prox_state);
+				hsdev->usage, prox_state);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -291,8 +296,8 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	prox_state->callbacks.send_event = prox_proc_event;
 	prox_state->callbacks.capture_sample = prox_capture_sample;
 	prox_state->callbacks.pdev = pdev;
-	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX,
-					&prox_state->callbacks);
+	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
+					   &prox_state->callbacks);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n");
 		goto error_iio_unreg;
@@ -314,7 +319,7 @@ static int hid_prox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct prox_state *prox_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);

-	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX);
+	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
 	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
 	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &prox_state->common_attributes);

@@ -326,6 +331,10 @@ static const struct platform_device_id hid_prox_ids[] = {
 		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
 		.name = "HID-SENSOR-200011",
 	},
+	{
+		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-tag-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
+		.name = "HID-SENSOR-LISS-0226",
+	},
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_prox_ids);
--
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:38:41 +0100
Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net> wrote:

> Use a generic 'hsdev->usage' instead of the HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX to
> allow this driver to drive the Lenvo custom proximity sensor, which is
> registered under a 'custom' usage and not HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX.
> 
> Add the Lenovo Intelligent Sensing Solution (LISS) human presence sensor
> to the platform device ids.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>

I gave a tag for this - if you deliberately didn't add it, I'd expect to see
a reason why.

Ah well, here it is again.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
> 
> v2:
> - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
> 
> v3:
> - No change.
> 
> v4:
> - Clean up switch statement.
> 
>  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
> index f10fa2abfe72..a47591e1bad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			      long mask)
>  {
>  	struct prox_state *prox_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev;
>  	int report_id = -1;
>  	u32 address;
>  	int ret_type;
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			report_id = prox_state->prox_attr.report_id;
>  			min = prox_state->prox_attr.logical_minimum;
>  			address = HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMAN_PRESENCE;
> +			hsdev = prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev;
>  			break;
>  		default:
>  			report_id = -1;
> @@ -84,11 +86,8 @@ static int prox_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			hid_sensor_power_state(&prox_state->common_attributes,
>  						true);
>  			*val = sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(
> -				prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev,
> -				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX, address,
> -				report_id,
> -				SENSOR_HUB_SYNC,
> -				min < 0);
> +				hsdev, hsdev->usage, address, report_id,
> +				SENSOR_HUB_SYNC, min < 0);
>  			hid_sensor_power_state(&prox_state->common_attributes,
>  						false);
>  		} else {
> @@ -191,10 +190,16 @@ static int prox_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> 
>  	switch (usage_id) {
>  	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMAN_PRESENCE:
> -		prox_state->human_presence = *(u32 *)raw_data;
> -		ret = 0;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> +		switch (raw_len) {
> +		case 1:
> +			prox_state->human_presence = *(u8 *)raw_data;
> +			return 0;
> +		case 4:
> +			prox_state->human_presence = *(u32 *)raw_data;
> +			return 0;
> +		default:
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	}
> 
> @@ -244,7 +249,7 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	prox_state->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev;
>  	prox_state->common_attributes.pdev = pdev;
> 
> -	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX,
> +	ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
>  					&prox_state->common_attributes,
>  					prox_sensitivity_addresses,
>  					ARRAY_SIZE(prox_sensitivity_addresses));
> @@ -262,7 +267,7 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>  	ret = prox_parse_report(pdev, hsdev,
>  				(struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels,
> -				HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX, prox_state);
> +				hsdev->usage, prox_state);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -291,8 +296,8 @@ static int hid_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	prox_state->callbacks.send_event = prox_proc_event;
>  	prox_state->callbacks.capture_sample = prox_capture_sample;
>  	prox_state->callbacks.pdev = pdev;
> -	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX,
> -					&prox_state->callbacks);
> +	ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage,
> +					   &prox_state->callbacks);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n");
>  		goto error_iio_unreg;
> @@ -314,7 +319,7 @@ static int hid_prox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct prox_state *prox_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> 
> -	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_PROX);
> +	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &prox_state->common_attributes);
> 
> @@ -326,6 +331,10 @@ static const struct platform_device_id hid_prox_ids[] = {
>  		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
>  		.name = "HID-SENSOR-200011",
>  	},
> +	{
> +		/* Format: HID-SENSOR-tag-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */
> +		.name = "HID-SENSOR-LISS-0226",
> +	},
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_prox_ids);
> --
> 2.38.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[srinivas pandruvada]

On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 00:38 +0100, Philipp Jungkamp wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm sorry for the confusion caused by me sending revisions as replies.
> I've now addresses the points raised. As I'm unfamiliar with mailing
> lists
> any recommendation on making the process more seamless is welcome.
> 
> Thank you for your time!
> 

For the series

Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>


> v2:
> - Patch 1/4:
>   - Remove unnecessary comments.
>   - Change return type of functions to bool. (introduced an error,
> fixed in v4)
>   - Swallows return value of a function. (fixed in v4)
> - Patch 2/4:
>   - Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the
> custom
>     sensor match table.
> - Patch 3/4:
>   - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
> - Patch 4/4:
>   - Allow for 1 byte human presence reports.
> 
> v3:
> - Patch 2/4
>   - Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'
> 
> v4:
> - Patch 1/4:
>   - Fix return value and error codes on property query.
>   - Document and ignore return values for queries of optionally matched
>     properties.
>   - Don't modify *known in _get_known, return error when not matched.
>   - Remove comment on newly added sensors from commit message.
> - Patch 4/4:
>   - Clean up switch statement.
> 
> Regards,
> Philipp Jungkamp
> 
> Philipp Jungkamp (4):
>   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors
>   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors
>   IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage
>   IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage
> 
>  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c     | 233 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c  |  27 ++--
>  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c |  37 +++--
>  include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h      |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.38.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Philipp Jungkamp]

Hello,

Is there something I still need to do for this to be merged in the next
merge window?

I don't quite understand what would happen next. I'm curious and hope I
don't bother in the busy times when approaching a merge window.

Regards,
Philipp Jungkamp

On Sun, 2022-11-27 at 09:33 -0800, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 00:38 +0100, Philipp Jungkamp wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm sorry for the confusion caused by me sending revisions as
> > replies.
> > I've now addresses the points raised. As I'm unfamiliar with
> > mailing
> > lists
> > any recommendation on making the process more seamless is welcome.
> > 
> > Thank you for your time!
> > 
> 
> For the series
> 
> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> 
> 
> > v2:
> > - Patch 1/4:
> >   - Remove unnecessary comments.
> >   - Change return type of functions to bool. (introduced an error,
> > fixed in v4)
> >   - Swallows return value of a function. (fixed in v4)
> > - Patch 2/4:
> >   - Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the
> > custom
> >     sensor match table.
> > - Patch 3/4:
> >   - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
> > - Patch 4/4:
> >   - Allow for 1 byte human presence reports.
> > 
> > v3:
> > - Patch 2/4
> >   - Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'
> > 
> > v4:
> > - Patch 1/4:
> >   - Fix return value and error codes on property query.
> >   - Document and ignore return values for queries of optionally
> > matched
> >     properties.
> >   - Don't modify *known in _get_known, return error when not
> > matched.
> >   - Remove comment on newly added sensors from commit message.
> > - Patch 4/4:
> >   - Clean up switch statement.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Philipp Jungkamp
> > 
> > Philipp Jungkamp (4):
> >   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors
> >   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors
> >   IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage
> >   IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage
> > 
> >  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c     | 233 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > ----
> >  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c  |  27 ++--
> >  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c |  37 +++--
> >  include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h      |   1 +
> >  4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> > 
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 23:51:50 +0100
Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is there something I still need to do for this to be merged in the next
> merge window?
> 
> I don't quite understand what would happen next. I'm curious and hope I
> don't bother in the busy times when approaching a merge window.
Given most of this is in HID, up to Jiri to pick it up when happy with it.

Has all the other responses I think it needs.  You are absolutely correct
to ping it given it's been a few weeks.

Jonathan
> 
> Regards,
> Philipp Jungkamp
> 
> On Sun, 2022-11-27 at 09:33 -0800, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 00:38 +0100, Philipp Jungkamp wrote:  
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry for the confusion caused by me sending revisions as
> > > replies.
> > > I've now addresses the points raised. As I'm unfamiliar with
> > > mailing
> > > lists
> > > any recommendation on making the process more seamless is welcome.
> > > 
> > > Thank you for your time!
> > >   
> > 
> > For the series
> > 
> > Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> >   
> > > v2:
> > > - Patch 1/4:
> > >   - Remove unnecessary comments.
> > >   - Change return type of functions to bool. (introduced an error,
> > > fixed in v4)
> > >   - Swallows return value of a function. (fixed in v4)
> > > - Patch 2/4:
> > >   - Create this 'noop' patch that just adds the LISS sensors to the
> > > custom
> > >     sensor match table.
> > > - Patch 3/4:
> > >   - Remove some unnecessary newlines in function calls.
> > > - Patch 4/4:
> > >   - Allow for 1 byte human presence reports.
> > > 
> > > v3:
> > > - Patch 2/4
> > >   - Add missing 'Signed-Off-By'
> > > 
> > > v4:
> > > - Patch 1/4:
> > >   - Fix return value and error codes on property query.
> > >   - Document and ignore return values for queries of optionally
> > > matched
> > >     properties.
> > >   - Don't modify *known in _get_known, return error when not
> > > matched.
> > >   - Remove comment on newly added sensors from commit message.
> > > - Patch 4/4:
> > >   - Clean up switch statement.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Philipp Jungkamp
> > > 
> > > Philipp Jungkamp (4):
> > >   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Allow more custom iio sensors
> > >   HID: hid-sensor-custom: Add LISS custom sensors
> > >   IIO: hid-sensor-als: Use generic usage
> > >   IIO: hid-sensor-prox: Use generic usage
> > > 
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c     | 233 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > ----
> > >  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c  |  27 ++--
> > >  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-prox.c |  37 +++--
> > >  include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h      |   1 +
> > >  4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >   
> > 
> >   
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Jiri Kosina]

On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Philipp Jungkamp wrote:

> Is there something I still need to do for this to be merged in the next
> merge window?
> 
> I don't quite understand what would happen next. I'm curious and hope I
> don't bother in the busy times when approaching a merge window.

Unless Jonathan prefers to take this through iio.git for some reason, I'll 
pick it up into hid.git for 6.3 once 6.2 merge window is over.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Philipp Jungkamp wrote:
> 
> > Is there something I still need to do for this to be merged in the next
> > merge window?
> > 
> > I don't quite understand what would happen next. I'm curious and hope I
> > don't bother in the busy times when approaching a merge window.  
> 
> Unless Jonathan prefers to take this through iio.git for some reason, I'll 
> pick it up into hid.git for 6.3 once 6.2 merge window is over.

Probably more sensible if you pick it up through hid.git given the balance of changes.

If you can make an immutable branch even better on the off chance anything else
comes up that hits few lines changed in the IIO drivers.  I'd only pull that
into IIO if we needed to though (and I would be surprised if we do!)

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks,
> 

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] IIO: More HID custom sensors

[Jiri Kosina]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> Probably more sensible if you pick it up through hid.git given the 
> balance of changes.
> 
> If you can make an immutable branch even better on the off chance anything else
> comes up that hits few lines changed in the IIO drivers.  I'd only pull that
> into IIO if we needed to though (and I would be surprised if we do!)

This is now in hid.git#for-6.3/hid-sensor and we can branch an immutable 
branch off it if needed (and if there are any hid-sensor patches coming on 
top later).

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs