From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: gts-helper: Fix division loop
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:50:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717b7e70-5cf8-4671-8a6b-005eefd0535e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a41ef2c9-bd74-4b0e-afb7-12e198847609@tweaklogic.com>
On 1/19/24 13:56, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> On 8/1/24 02:52, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:34:28 +0200
>> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The loop based 64bit division may run for a long time when dividend is a
>>> lot bigger than the divider. Replace the division loop by the
>>> div64_u64() which implementation may be significantly faster.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
>>> Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
>>
>> Hmm. Fix or not perf improvement? I'm going to take the middle ground
>> and leave the fixes tag, but not rush this in.
>>
>> So applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and for now just pushed out
>> as testing for 0-day etc to take a look before I rebase that tree after
>> rc1.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I've implemented also a fixup series for supporting rounding of
>>> gains/scales:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/37d3aa193e69577353d314e94463a08d488ddd8d.1701780964.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> That series does also remove the offending loop.
>>>
>>> We don't currently have any in-tree users of GTS helpers which would
>>> need the rounding support so pushing the rounding is not urgent (and I
>>> haven't heard of Subjahit whose driver required the rounding). Hence, we
>>> may want to only take this loop fix in for now (?) and reconsider
>>> rounding when someone need that.
>>>
>>> Jonathan, what's your take on this?
>> Agreed - let us wait for the rounding to have a user, but makes sense
>> to tidy this corner up in the meantime.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>>
>>> drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>>> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>>> index 7653261d2dc2..abcab2d38589 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>>> static int iio_gts_get_gain(const u64 max, const u64 scale)
>>> {
>>> u64 full = max;
>>> - int tmp = 1;
>>> + int tmp = 0;
>>> if (scale > full || !scale)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ static int iio_gts_get_gain(const u64 max, const
>>> u64 scale)
>>> tmp++;
>>> }
>>> - while (full > scale * (u64)tmp)
>>> - tmp++;
>>> + tmp += div64_u64(full, scale);
>>> return tmp;
>>> }
>>>
>>> base-commit: 2cc14f52aeb78ce3f29677c2de1f06c0e91471ab
>>
>>
> Hi Matti,
>
> Your fix works beautifully with the latest version of apds9306 driver
> which I am working on.
> All available scale values can be set without any errors. Thank you.
Thanks for testing Subhajit! Just to ensure we have no miscommunication
- did you test just this division fix, or the rounding fix here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/37d3aa193e69577353d314e94463a08d488ddd8d.1701780964.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
> Moving to a new city with a new full time job with the assumption of
> getting more time
> for my list of opensource projects and contributions proved to be
> utterly wrong!
Well, I can't blame you :) Being in a new work at new city sounds like
you have a lot on your plate right now. Give it half a year and things
will stabilize though :) Oh, and falsely assuming that "when XXX, I will
have the time to do YYY" - been there done that :)
Good luck on the new work and city!
Yours,
-- Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 9:34 [PATCH] iio: gts-helper: Fix division loop Matti Vaittinen
2024-01-07 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-08 6:35 ` Matti Vaittinen
2024-01-19 11:56 ` Subhajit Ghosh
2024-01-22 6:50 ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2024-01-22 9:58 ` Subhajit Ghosh
2024-02-04 13:49 ` Subhajit Ghosh
2024-02-05 9:19 ` Matti Vaittinen
2024-01-22 16:27 ` David Laight
2024-01-22 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-23 10:30 ` Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717b7e70-5cf8-4671-8a6b-005eefd0535e@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox