From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>, nuno.sa@analog.com
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iio: buffer-dma: Turn iio_dma_buffer_init() void
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:03:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <760dce5b5721ae6e46daeac03b96df7b009db3ce.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTBmriwVrMwlKiXX@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 18:34 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 03:11:38PM +0000, Nuno Sá via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > iio_dma_buffer_init() always return 0. Therefore there's no point in
> > returning int.
>
> > While at it, fix a mismatch between the function declaration and definition
> > regarding the struct device (dma_dev != dev).
>
> So, all others use simple dev?
Totally forgot about this. What do you mean by the above? If other functions in the
header use just dev? If so, the one I changed is the only one that uses struct device
(in that header). It is also consistent with what we have for the devm_iio_dmaengine_*
APIs.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 15:11 [PATCH 0/6] iio: buffer-dma: Minor cleanups and improvements Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] iio: buffer-dma: use lockdep instead of WARN() Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 16:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-04 11:20 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] iio: buffer-dma: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 16:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 21:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] iio: buffer-dma: Turn iio_dma_buffer_init() void Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 16:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-19 15:03 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-12-27 14:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-02 10:25 ` Nuno Sá
2026-01-02 12:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] iio: buffer-dma: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 16:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-04 11:25 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-06 21:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-03 16:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-03 16:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-04 11:21 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 11:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=760dce5b5721ae6e46daeac03b96df7b009db3ce.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox