Re: [PATCH v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

["Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 11:15 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on jic23-iio/togreg]
> [also build test ERROR on vkoul-dmaengine/next linus/master v6.10-rc4 next-
> 20240618]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:   
> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paul-Cercueil/dmaengine-Add-API-function-dmaengine_prep_peripheral_dma_vec/20240618-180602
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg
> patch link:   
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240618100302.72886-4-paul%40crapouillou.net
> patch subject: [PATCH v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
> config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20240619
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240619/202406191014.9JAzwRV6-lkp@intel.c
> om/config)
> compiler: clang version 18.1.5
> (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240619/202406191014.9JAzwRV6-lkp@intel.c
> om/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406191014.9JAzwRV6-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> > > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c:1715:3: error: cannot jump from this goto
> > > statement to its label
>     1715 |                 goto err_dmabuf_unmap_attachment;
>          |                 ^
>    drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c:1720:2: note: jump bypasses initialization of

I guess the compiler produces code that will run the cleanup function on an
uninitialized variable. I would then go back to plain mutex() instead of moving
guard() to a place where it does not make sense only to shut up the warnings.

- Nuno Sá