From: <Victor.Duicu@microchip.com>
To: <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: <dlechner@baylibre.com>, <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<robh@kernel.org>, <jic23@kernel.org>, <andy@kernel.org>,
<krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<Marius.Cristea@microchip.com>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: temperature: add support for MCP998X
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:07:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c80baf4616dbec339f3108690046e1dc43e24ae.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613-undergo-reviving-a97dca8f3b69@spud>
On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 15:40 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:02:06PM +0300,
> victor.duicu@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>
> >
Hi Conor,
> > This is the devicetree schema for Microchip MCP998X/33 and
> > MCP998XD/33D Automotive Temperature Monitor Family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>
> > ---
> > .../iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9982.yaml | 211
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 211 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp9982
> > .yaml
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp99
> > 82.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp99
> > 82.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ec939d463612
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/microchip,mcp99
> > 82.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >
> > +
> > + microchip,resistance-comp-ch1-2-enable:
> > + description:
> > + Enable resistance error correction(REC) for external
> > channels 1 and 2.
> > + The chip internal hardware counterbalances the parasitic
> > resistance in
> > + series with the external diodes. The compensation can be
> > activated or
> > + disabled in hardware for both channels 1 and 2 at the same
> > time.
> > + type: boolean
>
> On the previous version I objected to this wording for the property,
> where it is being used as an enable, and instead said that it should
> indicate the presence of the parasitic resistance. Did I miss some
> sort
> of new justification for it still talking about being an enable?
>
My apologies, I forgot to modify the name of the variable.
I will change the variables to something like:
microchip,parasitic-res-on-channel1-2:
description:
Indicates that the chip and the diodes/transistors are sufficiently far
apart that a parasitic resistance is added to the wires, which can
affect the measurements. Due to the anti-parallel diode connections,
channels 1 and 2 are affected together.
>
> > + microchip,resistance-comp-ch3-4-enable:
> > + description:
> > + Enable resistance error correction(REC) for external
> > channels 3 and 4.
> > + The chip internal hardware counterbalances the parasitic
> > resistance in
> > + series with the external diodes. The compensation can be
> > activated or
> > + disabled in hardware for both channels 3 and 4 at the same
> > time.
> > + type: boolean
>
With Kind Regards,
Victor Duicu
> Cheers,
> Conor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 13:02 [PATCH v3 0/2] add support for MCP998X victor.duicu
2025-06-13 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: temperature: " victor.duicu
2025-06-13 14:40 ` Conor Dooley
2025-06-23 13:07 ` Victor.Duicu [this message]
2025-07-28 13:01 ` Victor.Duicu
2025-07-29 16:27 ` David Lechner
2025-06-13 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " victor.duicu
2025-06-13 21:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-19 7:22 ` Victor.Duicu
2025-06-19 8:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-21 17:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-23 6:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-14 13:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-14 13:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c80baf4616dbec339f3108690046e1dc43e24ae.camel@microchip.com \
--to=victor.duicu@microchip.com \
--cc=Marius.Cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox