From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hid-sensor-accel-3d: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in hid_accel_3d_probe()
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180204112346.0977e938@archlinux>
> If making changes like this I would suggest only sending one until
> you have have a response from the relevant maintainer.
The corresponding feedback can become more positive for such
a transformation pattern after a while, can't it?
> It would save you time as often these sorts of changes are
> a matter of personal taste and weighing up of costs vs gains
> - hence it is not obvious that they will be accepted.
Can the wording “WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message”
(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 21:26 [PATCH] hid-sensor-accel-3d: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in hid_accel_3d_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-04 11:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-05 18:26 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2018-02-05 21:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-06 8:45 ` Software evolution around “checkpatch.pl”? SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-10 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-10 14:59 ` Joe Perches
2018-02-10 15:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-10 17:42 ` Joe Perches
2018-02-10 18:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).