From: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dbd2ae7883ec8dba65706603a29f3144076840e.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOjAK9LRMCcBspkb@lore-desk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1852 bytes --]
On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 10:13 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 00:30 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > The rate at which accelerometer or gyroscope sensor samples are fed
> > > > to the hardware FIFO (batch data rate, or BDR) does not have to
> > > > coincide with the sensor sampling frequency (output data rate, or
> > > > ODR); the only requirement is for the BDR to not be greater than
> > > > the ODR. Having a BDR lower than the ODR is useful in cases where
> > > > an application requires a high sampling rate for accurate detection
> > > > of motion events (e.g. wakeup events), but wants to read sensor
> > > > sample values from the device buffer at a lower data rate.
> > >
> > > can you please provide more details here? Are you using the hw fifo
> > > to
> > > read
> > > data? If we configure the hw fifo according to the BDR (even assuming
> > > the
> > > watermark is set 1) the hw will generate interrupts according to the
> > > BDR
> > > (bdr < odr).
> >
> > Yes, I'm using the hw fifo to read data. The use case is to enable
> > event
> > detection (which works best at high sampling rates) and sensor data
> > streaming at the same time, without requiring the data stream to be at
> > the
> > same rate as the sensor sampling rate. So the amount of I2C (or SPI)
> > traffic (as well as the rate of periodic interrupts) required by the
> > data
> > stream is kept to a minimum without sacrificing the accuracy of event
> > detection.
>
> I guess you can get the same result (reduce sensor data interrupt rate
> keeping high odr value) configuring the hw fifo watermark.
> Does it work for you?
Setting the hw fifo watermark to a high value reduces the rate of
interrupts, but doesn't do much to reduce the amount of I2C traffic, so the
issue would still be there.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 17:36 [PATCH 0/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix measurement unit for odr struct member Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 20:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-09 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 22:30 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 7:12 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-10 8:13 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 9:28 ` Francesco Lavra [this message]
2025-10-10 13:15 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 15:50 ` David Lechner
2025-10-10 16:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 16:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 18:35 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-10 14:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 18:44 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-15 14:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 17:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-10 18:50 ` Francesco Lavra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-16 17:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Francesco Lavra
2025-10-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Francesco Lavra
2025-10-16 20:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dbd2ae7883ec8dba65706603a29f3144076840e.camel@baylibre.com \
--to=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox