linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Galbusera <gizero@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: add masking of unknown bits
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:07:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC+thW18COMt48VYwMOSMgP8huSRfhu7RLFvpObkAWVAWkS8Uw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E24B24-6DC9-4ECB-8752-B974BD6C53E8@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2263 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 14 July 2015 14:36:20 BST, Andrea Galbusera <gizero@gmail.com> wrote:
> >According to the datasheet, the 2 MSBs for parts 3001 and 3201 are
> >unspecified and should be masked out
> Theoretical issue or one with observed bad effects?
>

Hi! Thanks for reviewing. While in the business of adding support for 3301,
I couldn't figure out why no masking wasn't done for similar parts like
3001 and 3201. Further investigation of previous patches reviews [1], where
masking was suggested and initially implemented, convinced me the bit was
lost somewhere, with no explicit motivation. Nevertheless, 3301 is the only
chip of the family I have at hands: hence, yes, this specific patch in the
set is addressing a theoretical issue.

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=140748835509583&w=2


> Changes the path and timing of this getting applied. Patch itself is fine
> either way!
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera <gizero@gmail.com>
> >---
> >
> >This was already suggested but for some reason got lost during review
> >of a
> >previous patch. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=140748835509583&w=2
> >and following discussion
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> >index 8d9c9b9..0673ee7 100644
> >--- a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> >+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> >@@ -114,13 +114,13 @@ static int mcp320x_adc_conversion(struct mcp320x
> >*adc, u8 channel,
> >
> >       switch (device_index) {
> >       case mcp3001:
> >-              return (adc->rx_buf[0] << 5 | adc->rx_buf[1] >> 3);
> >+              return ((adc->rx_buf[0] & 0x1f) << 5 | adc->rx_buf[1] >>
> 3);
> >       case mcp3002:
> >       case mcp3004:
> >       case mcp3008:
> >               return (adc->rx_buf[0] << 2 | adc->rx_buf[1] >> 6);
> >       case mcp3201:
> >-              return (adc->rx_buf[0] << 7 | adc->rx_buf[1] >> 1);
> >+              return ((adc->rx_buf[0] & 0x1f) << 7 | adc->rx_buf[1] >>
> 1);
> >       case mcp3202:
> >       case mcp3204:
> >       case mcp3208:
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3790 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-14 13:36 [PATCH 1/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: add masking of unknown bits Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-14 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: Add support for mcp3301 Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-14 13:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: Kconfig update description Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-14 21:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-14 13:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: update dt-bindings help Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-19 12:39     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-14 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] iio: adc: mcp320x: add masking of unknown bits Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-15  5:07   ` Andrea Galbusera [this message]
2015-07-15  5:13   ` Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-15 18:12 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-19 12:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-22  5:15     ` Andrea Galbusera
2015-07-22  5:57       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAC+thW18COMt48VYwMOSMgP8huSRfhu7RLFvpObkAWVAWkS8Uw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gizero@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).