Re: BMI160 accelerometer on AyaNeo tablet

[Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>]

Added software@ayaneo.com to CC ( I found this email on google).

Best regards,
   Maxim Levitsky


On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> +Cc: more Aya-Neo emails (please, share it with your legal, involved managers
>      and engineers).
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:05:25PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Any news from Aya-Neo? Have you fixed and issued a new firmware, please?
> >
> > Nothing I heard of. Anything I can do to further help with this?
>
> Unfortunately we need to hear from the Aya-Neo, if they ever care about their
> products. Without that it would make an unfortunate precedent which will open
> a Pandora's box (means a green light on abusing ACPI specification and other's
> IPs, yes, Intellectual Property in this case, as ID is an IP of the corresponding
> vendor).
>
> I'm fine if Realtek doesn't care about their IDs to be (ab)used by somebody else,
> the main problem here is on Aya-Neo side.
>
> Is there any engineer-to-engineer connection with Aya-Neo? Because using that
> info@ address may be simply ignored / went to spam / etc.
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:50 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I filed the form, Cc'ed this to more people from Realtek, still no response on
> > > the topic. Does Realtek really cares about their IDs?
> > >
> > > Any news from Aya-Neo? Have you fixed and issued a new firmware, please?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:21:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > +Cc: another set of emails from Realtek as per Hayes' email.
> > > >
> > > > Please waterfall to the people inside Realtek who can answer the question.
> > > > (Note, you may access this discussion in full via:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CACAwPwYQHRcrabw9=0tvenPzAcwwW1pTaR6a+AEWBF9Hqf_wXQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#u)
> > > >
> > > > The problem here is to have an official confirmation of what 10ec:5280
> > > > ID is from Realtek's point of view.
> > > >
> > > > Context: the current discussion and a patch state that it's related
> > > > to gyro sensor. Is it so?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:36:12AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, October 20, 2021, Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 5:59 PM
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > Realtek probably should make this ID marked somehow broken and not
> > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > in their products in case the answer to the first of the above
> > > > > > question
> > > > > > > > > is "yes". (Of course in case the ID will be used for solely PCI
> > > > > > enumerated
> > > > > > > > > product there will be no conflict, I just propose to be on the
> > > > > > safest side,
> > > > > > > > > but remark should be made somewhere).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any comments from Realtek, please?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Excuse me. I don't know this device, so I don't know who I could forward.
> > > > > > Maybe you could try our contract window from our web site.
> > > > > > https://www.realtek.com/en/cu-1-en/cu-1-taiwan-en
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reply. I will try my best, but I am afraid that what you suggest
> > > > > will be a long loop (and I believe the people behind that form are not
> > > > > technical, they probably won’t understand the topic). I think you may pull
> > > > > strings inside much faster. Just ask somebody who is technical superior in
> > > > > your team / organization. Ideally inside company you may have a dedicated
> > > > > people who responsible for allocating PCI and ACPI IDs.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>