Where did the assertion the second device is a magnetometer come from? Just the data sheet?
Steve
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> > But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a patch
>>> > removing the ifdef fun if you like!
>
>>> Where can I see the patch?
>
>> Doh. I clearly forgot to push out. Should be able to push to
>> iio.git on kernel.org later.
>
> Thanks, I can see it now.
>
> This patch almost wrong. Not by functionality it brings, but by style.
Oy vey, the second device is *not* accelerometer, it is a magnetometer [1].
[1]: https://www.mouser.com/ds/2/783/BST-BMC150-DS000-04-786477.pdf
> I'll send soon a series of fixes to the driver (compile tested only)
> to provide my view on the matters.
>
> P.S. In the future (I have some kind of deja vu I have told this
> already to someone), please, Cc one or more of Rafael, Mika and/or me
> for ACPI matters.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko