Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Update APDS990x ALS to support device trees

[Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>]

сб, 18 квіт. 2026 р. о 23:21 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> пише:
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2026, at 18:24, David Lechner wrote:
> > On 4/18/26 9:47 AM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >> Document Avago APDS9900/9901 ALS/Proximity sensor in schema and modernize
> >> its driver to support OF bindings.
> >>
> >> Svyatoslav Ryhel (5):
> >>   dt-bindings: iio: light: Document Avago APDS9900/9901 ALS/Proximity
> >>     sensor
> >>   misc: apds990x: Use more device managed approach in the probe
> >>   misc: apds990x: Drop Vled supply
> >>   misc: apds990x: Convert to use OF bindings
> >>   misc: apds990x: Drop IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW trigger
> >>
> >>  .../bindings/iio/light/avago,apds9900.yaml    |  83 ++++++++
> >>  drivers/misc/apds990x.c                       | 197 +++++++++---------
> >
> > As mentioned in my reply to the dt-bindings patch, there is already an
> > IIO driver that looks like it could be compatible. I'm guessing that
> > this misc driver pre-dates the IIO subsystem. I would have a look at it
> > instead (drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c).
>
> I see that we have a number of ALS drivers like this one in drivers/misc:
>
> drivers/misc/apds9802als.c
> drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
> drivers/misc/isl29020.c
> drivers/misc/isl29003.c
>
> As far as I can tell, all of these are entirely unused, with nothing
> in the kernel creating the platform devices. The drivers that used
> instead have all been converted to drivers/iio a long time ago.
>
> Is it time to remove all of the above?
>

I will remove APDS990x from misc in v2 since this one I can convert it
to use tsl2772 instead.

> The notable exception is drivers/misc/tsl2550.c, which is instantiated
> from both arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am335x-evm.dts and
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-taos-evm.c. There is a similarly named
> drivers/iio/light/tsl2563.c driver, but unfortunately that uses
> a completely different register level interface.
>
>       Arnd