Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: hw-consumer: fix use-after-free in error path

Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-29T07:01:59Z

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:34:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:59:28 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

...

> >> I am also wondering should we put Reported-by with the reference to AI somehow?
> >> Jonathan, others, what are your opinions?
> >
> > Would be nice to do so for these - things noticed whilst reviewing a patch
> > type reports.
> >
> > Roman (+CC), any suggestions on how to do this?
>
> I appreciate when people are recognizing Sashiko, but I don’t have any strong
> preference. Many engineers are using it locally before sending patches
> upstream, so we’ll never know it anyway. But Reported-by/Assisted-by tags are
> appreciated when appropriate.

The problem is what to put to Reported-by as an email. For example LKP bot or
syzbot have dedicated emails for that. What about Sashiko?

P.S.
An offtopic, how can I be email notified on the reviews done by Sashiko against
my patches sent to Linux kernel project (mailing lists)? If you can add me
as andy@kernel.org, I appreciate that!