Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: hw-consumer: fix use-after-free in error path

Roman Gushchin
2026-04-29T17:00:42Z

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:34:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>> > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:59:28 +0300
>> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> >> I am also wondering should we put Reported-by with the reference to AI somehow?
>> >> Jonathan, others, what are your opinions?
>> >
>> > Would be nice to do so for these - things noticed whilst reviewing a patch
>> > type reports.
>> >
>> > Roman (+CC), any suggestions on how to do this?
>>
>> I appreciate when people are recognizing Sashiko, but I don’t have any strong
>> preference. Many engineers are using it locally before sending patches
>> upstream, so we’ll never know it anyway. But Reported-by/Assisted-by tags are
>> appreciated when appropriate.
>
> The problem is what to put to Reported-by as an email. For example LKP bot or
> syzbot have dedicated emails for that. What about Sashiko?

We have sashiko-bot@kernel.org !

>
> P.S.
> An offtopic, how can I be email notified on the reviews done by Sashiko against
> my patches sent to Linux kernel project (mailing lists)? If you can add me
> as andy@kernel.org, I appreciate that!

I don't have a personal opt-in at the moment, it's configurable per
mailing list. The current configuration is here:
https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml

I generally rely on the consensus decision by corresponding maintainers.

Thanks!