From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter:ti-eqep: remove floor
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:46:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9dQeKy/Ol4d+3iM@shinobu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214000927.1793062-1-david@lechnology.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2296 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 06:09:27PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> The hardware doesn't support this. QPOSINIT is an initialization value
> that is triggered by other things. When the counter overflows, it
> always wraps around to zero.
>
> Fixes: f213729f6796 "counter: new TI eQEP driver"
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Is the QPOSINIT preprocessor define needed at all anymore, or should it also be
removed?
Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c | 35 -----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> index a60aee1a1a29..65df9ef5b5bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> @@ -235,36 +235,6 @@ static ssize_t ti_eqep_position_ceiling_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> return len;
> }
>
> -static ssize_t ti_eqep_position_floor_read(struct counter_device *counter,
> - struct counter_count *count,
> - void *ext_priv, char *buf)
> -{
> - struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv = counter->priv;
> - u32 qposinit;
> -
> - regmap_read(priv->regmap32, QPOSINIT, &qposinit);
> -
> - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", qposinit);
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t ti_eqep_position_floor_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> - struct counter_count *count,
> - void *ext_priv, const char *buf,
> - size_t len)
> -{
> - struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv = counter->priv;
> - int err;
> - u32 res;
> -
> - err = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &res);
> - if (err < 0)
> - return err;
> -
> - regmap_write(priv->regmap32, QPOSINIT, res);
> -
> - return len;
> -}
> -
> static ssize_t ti_eqep_position_enable_read(struct counter_device *counter,
> struct counter_count *count,
> void *ext_priv, char *buf)
> @@ -301,11 +271,6 @@ static struct counter_count_ext ti_eqep_position_ext[] = {
> .read = ti_eqep_position_ceiling_read,
> .write = ti_eqep_position_ceiling_write,
> },
> - {
> - .name = "floor",
> - .read = ti_eqep_position_floor_read,
> - .write = ti_eqep_position_floor_write,
> - },
> {
> .name = "enable",
> .read = ti_eqep_position_enable_read,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 0:09 [PATCH] counter:ti-eqep: remove floor David Lechner
2020-12-14 11:46 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2020-12-14 14:05 ` David Lechner
2020-12-29 18:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X9dQeKy/Ol4d+3iM@shinobu \
--to=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox