Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@iit.it>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: bno055: uninitialized variable bug in bno055_trigger_handler()
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:55:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2kOOxSc60IBuzhk@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221029163956.2a70dc94@jic23-huawei>

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 04:39:56PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:33:59 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:39:52 +0300
> > Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This bug is basically harmless, although it will trigger a runtime warning
> > > if you use KMSan.  On the first iteration through the loop, the
> > > "best_delta" variable is uninitialized so re-order the condition to
> > > prevent reading uninitialized memory.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4aefe1c2bd0c ("iio: imu: add Bosch Sensortec BNO055 core driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>  
> > 
> > You reported this a while back along with a second issue (false positive)
> > with hwval.
> > 
> > I posted a patch fixing both 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20221002145324.3776484-1-jic23@kernel.org/
> > 
> > I don't really care which patch goes in, but curious to reasoning to not also
> > deal with the hwval warning here?
> > 
> Meh. Rather than not applying either patch, I'll pick this one up.  We can
> deal with the hwval warning at a later date if necessary.
> 

Sorry, I am behind in my email.

There was a couple weeks in between sending the bug report and the patch
so I forgot about it.  Also I send those bug reports from a different
system so I don't check that as part of the QC process.  I'm moving to
checking vger instead of grepping my outbox but I haven't automated that
yet.

I don't get a "hwval" warning on my system so using the cross function
DB must have silenced the false positive.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14  9:39 [PATCH] iio: imu: bno055: uninitialized variable bug in bno055_trigger_handler() Dan Carpenter
2022-10-14 10:38 ` Sa, Nuno
2022-10-15 16:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-10-29 15:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-07 13:55     ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2kOOxSc60IBuzhk@kadam \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.merello@iit.it \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox