Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add lower resolution devices support

[Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@baylibre.com>]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 02:12:53PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue,  8 Apr 2025 06:21:20 -0700
> Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@baylibre.com> wrote:
> 
> > The adcxx4s communicates with a host processor via an SPI/Microwire Bus
> > interface. The device family responds with 12-bit data, of which the LSB
> > bits are transmitted by the lower resolution devices as 0.
> > The unavailable bits are 0 in LSB.
> > Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and
> > raw data read.
> > 
> > Lets reuse the driver to support the family of devices with name
> > ADC<bb><c>S<sss>, where
> > * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> > * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4, 8)
> > * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500 kSPS
> > and 101 for 1 MSPS)
> > 
> > Complete datasheets are available at TI's website here:
> > https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/adc<bb><c>s<sss>.pdf
> > 
> > Tested only with ti-adc102s051 on BegalePlay SBC.
> > https://www.beagleboard.org/boards/beagleplay
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3: 
> >         - used be16_to_cpu() for the endian conversion.
> >         - used config index enum while setting up the adc128_config[]
> > 
> > - Link to v2: 
> >         https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231022031203.632153-1-sukrut.bellary@linux.com/
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >         - Arranged of_device_id and spi_device_id in numeric order.
> >         - Used enum to index into adc128_config.
> >         - Reorder adc128_config in alphabetical.
> >         - Include channel resolution information.
> >         - Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and 
> >         raw data read.
> > 
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220701042919.18180-1-nm@ti.com/
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > index a456ea78462f..d4b76fd85abd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,22 @@
> >   * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc128s052.pdf
> >   * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc122s021.pdf
> >   * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc124s021.pdf
> > + *
> > + * The adcxx4s communicates with a host processor via an SPI/Microwire Bus
> > + * interface. This driver supports the whole family of devices with a name
> > + * ADC<bb><c>S<sss>, where
> > + * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> > + * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4, 8)
> > + * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500 kSPS
> > + * and 101 for 1 MSPS)
> > + *
> > + * Complete datasheets are available at TI's website here:
> > + *   https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/adc<bb><c>s<sss>.pdf
> > + *
> > + * 8, 10, and 12 bits converters send 12-bit data with
> > + * unavailable bits set to 0 in LSB.
> > + * Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and
> > + * raw data read.
> >   */
> >  
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> > @@ -53,7 +69,7 @@ static int adc128_adc_conversion(struct adc128 *adc, u8 channel)
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	return ((adc->buffer[0] << 8 | adc->buffer[1]) & 0xFFF);
> > +	return be16_to_cpu(*((__be16 *)adc->buffer));
> 
> I think we now have a convenient adc->buffer16 (probably introduced in Matti's
> series.  Sorry I missed the overlap of the two series until now. These part numbers
> are too long and confusing to stick in my head!
> 
> Matti took on maintaining that driver because he wanted to see any changes
> that might affect the Rohm part it now supports.  If anyone wants to volunteer
> from the TI side of things that would be ideal - just send a patch adding to
> the new MAINTAINERS entry.

Thanks for the review.
Sure, I can work on the TI side of things.

> Jonathan
> 
> 
> >  }