> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> 
> This driver caused a false positive with __cond_lock() style solution
> but is fine with the simple boolean return approach now used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> index 4fdcc2acc94e..670cd217eb50 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> @@ -1804,12 +1804,11 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  
>  	switch (mask) {
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> -		ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> -		if (ret)
> -			break;
> +		if (!iio_device_claim_direct(iio_dev))
> +			return -EBUSY;
>  
>  		ret = st_lsm6dsx_read_oneshot(sensor, ch->address, val);
> -		iio_device_release_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> +		iio_device_release_direct(iio_dev);
>  		break;
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
>  		*val = sensor->odr / 1000;
> @@ -1834,11 +1833,10 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  				int val, int val2, long mask)
>  {
>  	struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;
>  
> -	err = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	if (!iio_device_claim_direct(iio_dev))
> +		return -EBUSY;
>  
>  	switch (mask) {
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> @@ -1860,7 +1858,7 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	iio_device_release_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> +	iio_device_release_direct(iio_dev);
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.48.1
>