From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Silvano Seva <s.seva@4sigma.it>
Cc: a.greco@4sigma.it, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
"open list:ST LSM6DSx IMU IIO DRIVER" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix possible lockup during FIFO read
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:40:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8sFdGG4bDyALrsi@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALKJsrqc__ZeLoZ5V+hBxVMU+Crpv_YG0KM69N1CXuHc_rM-FQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4045 bytes --]
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:48 PM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Prevent st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo and st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo functions
> > > from falling in an infinite loop in case pattern_len is equal to zero and
> > > the device FIFO is not empty.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Silvano Seva <s.seva@4sigma.it>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > index 0a7cd8c1aa33..7f343614f8a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> > > @@ -395,12 +395,17 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> > > fifo_len = (le16_to_cpu(fifo_status) & fifo_diff_mask) *
> > > ST_LSM6DSX_CHAN_SIZE;
> > > fifo_len = (fifo_len / pattern_len) * pattern_len;
> > > + if (!fifo_len)
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > I do not think this check is necessary since if fifo_len is 0 we will not run
> > the for loop, right?
>
> This check is present in the st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo() function, i
> added it here for consistency. I agree with you that is not strictly
> necessary.
>
> >
> > >
> > > acc_sensor = iio_priv(hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC]);
> > > gyro_sensor = iio_priv(hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO]);
> > > if (hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0])
> > > ext_sensor = iio_priv(hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0]);
> > >
> > > + if (!pattern_len)
> > > + pattern_len = ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;
> >
> > same here, I do not think pattern_len can be 0 since hw->sip must be greater
> > than 0 in order to enable the FIFO. Moreover, this check should be some lines
> > above since we have already divided fifo_len by pattern_len here.
> >
>
> There is a situation causing the subsequent for loop to never
> terminate, hanging the kernel boot process: given a system which
> doesn't have an hardware reset line allowing the kernel to
> re-initialize the IMU hardware, in case of an hot reboot the driver
> probe() function attempts to flush the FIFO, which may contain some
> data, while the hw->sip is zero.
> The complete execution path is the following:
> - call of st_lsm6dsx_probe();
> - allocation of the st_lsm6dsx_hw structure via the devm_kzalloc,
> zero-initializing the sip field;
> - call of st_lsm6dsx_init_device();
> - call of st_lsm6dsx_reset_device();
> - call of st_lsm6dsx_flush_fifo();
> - call of st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo/st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo via the
> fifo_ops function pointer.
ack, I can see the issue now, thx for pointing this out. I should we should set
pattern_len to ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE or ST_LSM6DSX_TAGGED_SAMPLE_SIZE if it is
0. Can you please move the check before updating fifo_len in
st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo()?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> An alternative solution to solve this situation is initializing the
> hw->sip field to a sane default value in either the probe() or
> init_device() function.
>
> > > +
> > > for (read_len = 0; read_len < fifo_len; read_len += pattern_len) {
> > > err = st_lsm6dsx_read_block(hw, ST_LSM6DSX_REG_FIFO_OUTL_ADDR,
> > > hw->buff, pattern_len,
> > > @@ -623,6 +628,9 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> > > if (!fifo_len)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > + if (!pattern_len)
> > > + pattern_len = ST_LSM6DSX_TAGGED_SAMPLE_SIZE;
> >
> > for the reason above, this is not necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > > +
> > > for (read_len = 0; read_len < fifo_len; read_len += pattern_len) {
> > > err = st_lsm6dsx_read_block(hw,
> > > ST_LSM6DSX_REG_FIFO_OUT_TAG_ADDR,
> > > --
> > > 2.48.1
> > >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 13:21 [PATCH] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix possible lockup during FIFO read Silvano Seva
2025-03-06 15:48 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-03-07 9:20 ` Silvano Seva
2025-03-07 14:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2025-03-10 13:22 ` Silvano Seva
2025-03-10 13:29 ` Silvano Seva
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-10 13:36 Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8sFdGG4bDyALrsi@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.greco@4sigma.it \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.seva@4sigma.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).