From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fgw23-7.mail.saunalahti.fi (fgw23-7.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391A3A32 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 19:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.142.5.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742155094; cv=none; b=nTfN+v6+uEOpp13fxYCQYOAO3EcK+7TMLcQIKRA0x0GZ9DJqKQXZ+WIwOcGq4fPmLVIRzSWEEdTurVCpz26Pom74SxToZTNOQkDNjfK0OB/0wdsNpWdAlAEU/GD4Os1++R8ypik8Piks8Z1Qg2GPWG+8mzTomb/syaaAQ0HbucM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742155094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Lw4+WlvrhcxgmS13gAyfNa3XA8OdF/0Wds1xS0aLwZY=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=O/cfXfeZGo3MDL+nMErASqiRdQyHw8/KkzGU2pVhKeb1AMNyIsV3Mcen9iXBjRxvU73OhvoCvfjlUhJ6jL8gM3DRX0pWPFcCc7myZeEgFTHRxTFKoiyFbysPmIdtbQV9eg1YrSUgZOEQJYwY5Yn3hfWBLhmvCQ+YF/tiuktB7Mg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.142.5.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: from localhost (88-113-26-232.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.113.26.232]) by fgw20.mail.saunalahti.fi (Halon) with ESMTP id f6f6ba18-02a0-11f0-ab76-005056bd6ce9; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 21:58:01 +0200 (EET) From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 21:58:00 +0200 To: Lothar Rubusch Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eraretuya@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] iio: accel: adxl345: introduce adxl345_push_event function Message-ID: References: <20250313165049.48305-1-l.rubusch@gmail.com> <20250313165049.48305-5-l.rubusch@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250313165049.48305-5-l.rubusch@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:50:39PM +0000, Lothar Rubusch kirjoitti: > Move the fifo handling into a separate function. This is a preparation > for a generic handling of the interrupt status register results. > > The interrupt status register is read into a variable int_stat. It carries > status for various sensor events, handling of which is added in follow up > patches. Evaluation of the int_stat variable is common for sensor events, > such as tap detection, freefall, activity,... and for fifo events, such as > data ready, overrun, watermark,... Also, dealing with in case error > returns shall be common to all events. Thus migrate fifo read-out and push > fifo content to iio channels into this function to be built up with > additional event handling. ... > +static int adxl345_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int int_stat) > +{ > + struct adxl345_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > + int samples; > + int ret = -ENOENT; > + > + if (FIELD_GET(ADXL345_INT_WATERMARK, int_stat)) { > + samples = adxl345_get_samples(st); > + if (samples < 0) > + return -EINVAL; In the original code it makes no difference, but if you are going to share this, I would expect to see return samples; here. Why the error code is shadowed? If it's trully needed, it has to be explained in the comment. > + if (adxl345_fifo_push(indio_dev, samples) < 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} ... Jonathan, I saw that you had applied it, but I guess the above needs a clarification. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko