Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct 'adt7316_limit_regs'

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>]

* Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:30:08AM +0100, linux@treblig.org wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
> > 
> > 'adt7316_limit_regs' has never been used since the original
> > commit 35f6b6b86ede ("staging: iio: new ADT7316/7/8 and ADT7516/7/9
> > driver").
> > 
> > The comment above it is a copy-and-paste from a different struct.
> > 
> > Remove both the struct and the comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 8 --------
> >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > index 79467f056a05..23d036d2802c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > @@ -209,14 +209,6 @@ struct adt7316_chip_info {
> >  #define ADT7316_TEMP_AIN_INT_MASK	\
> >  	(ADT7316_TEMP_INT_MASK)
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * struct adt7316_chip_info - chip specific information
> > - */
> > -
> > -struct adt7316_limit_regs {
> > -	u16	data_high;
> > -	u16	data_low;
> > -};
> >  
> 
> Could you delete the blank line as well?  Otherwise we have two blank
> lines in a row and checkpatch will complain.

Sure, v2 sent.
(checkpatch didn't moan at me with or without).

Dave

> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 
> 
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/