From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219B5C433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229922AbiDLO0Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:26:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51394 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231205AbiDLO0P (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:26:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4904DF56 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id c7so28054516wrd.0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:23:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e6gpITP/aGZM2Pksopppq7kd5eH2UEekWtZGMMcXdb8=; b=VUhPZmUorLbUp12x8z8wU09pFW1NSPxr5MSgVYXxC1JNKlOXpP6+f7STr2xOyj7rhe rQjAIqemggYlZJXhtVm321Xfv735AFVrMRaMTsMLIq32Ub9iYJwZ+z8Bqa91FJGWcUtF ZPbuxvFPFCJNBgHDiE4K/7sggZ+VBM7y44asDS66gYqYhvGIja7RnI527Q5Gtknh5NQX 9dGWHAxJirFnW+aunmQZm1/7uzNCwMrN5tVQY+Zhtsyo9OPOMfyraAh3pXxxVrh8g/nY nlAf58pqTiHLRcktrrT1uqWuG2ntN/Fwd3+u0paz+tt3BY93n6vVW55/OryWUQJyBCIJ Hs9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e6gpITP/aGZM2Pksopppq7kd5eH2UEekWtZGMMcXdb8=; b=M4ADYRrdyyCO01mGMyr3F5QDYd4TTPkWtxn+ZMt/7lJQ8TBNy5zP7tcwGL3/rZCsKR updTAyZC9AXARFSictgwxqKI/jNDem57zPUT4oSTwkqEFpisYNdKmPIhhkF/eGnjEZED Kx9Cx5c7fHSBPyLQxAmeU8YORh7vioy3Xcv90XYR04kgkRMmrVEMMdCaoLJZ/vTSeApZ X1umdTolXm5x75oN+8EalFutQIP5ObS9pc2/x8MIVH9rw2DUI1Fp0lK6RIY/5Avqr77B nXysBx8L/am8t3gyIx4+FXLUZY0765inJjx+UK1x5tlMPSSecHETEwpkVZcunrOcdbgk ubnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hLQUcPH5HFjjApjpnJrUMSrJB2bR5fFOHQIRd1sJ1z4ZW/UJ/ KnmFE43RECEkUEwXiyg3Ajw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwAZdlKNPJriClSRgRQg15MP/tAAjxCh0oKyII0EVK6lD22L3a99QR7dUHPzXE24BRMGXmYg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6208:0:b0:203:dde4:c76e with SMTP id y8-20020a5d6208000000b00203dde4c76emr29098008wru.273.1649773436449; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:a61:2b0b:9901:a42c:cba6:f5ae:31f5? ([2001:a61:2b0b:9901:a42c:cba6:f5ae:31f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o6-20020a05600c378600b0038eca3cdbb3sm1484045wmr.13.2022.04.12.07.23.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: GSoC Proposal 2022 From: Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ma=EDra?= Canal Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio , "Bogdan, Dragos" , "Hegbeli, Ciprian" , Cosmin Tanislav , Puranjay Mohan Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 16:23:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20220410182819.23967855@jic23-huawei> <20220411095219.000058a8@Huawei.com> <59c37b67bbc4a24336e5220a7ad4f242d854fb76.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-2.fc35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 09:24 -0300, Maíra Canal wrote: > On 04/12, Nuno Sá wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 11:48 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:43 AM Maíra Canal > > > wrote: > > > > On 04/11, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > The MAX31875 looks to be a fairly simple one (maybe a good > > candidate > > for a first driver) but, IMO, having it in IIO boils down to have > > support for continuos mode which would mean triggered buffer > > support. > > I took another look at the Maxim Integrated catalog and end up > finding > the MAX31889 Temperature Sensor. > > I guess this sensor has an interesting challenge level with the need > to > implement FIFO and interrupts support. > > Have you guys some thoughts on this one? > At first glance, it looks like a better choice when compared with MAX31875... - Nuno Sá > > >