On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:43:18PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:24:20AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote:
> > > I've noticed that the patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" in
> > > the patchwork, could it be a mistake? Because I never received any
> > > change request.
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > I can't comment on the patchwork status because I don't use that
> > service, but I apologize nonetheless for the delay in responding to your
> > patch submission. I'm hoping for an Ack from Oleksij, but this is a
> > pretty straight-forward fix that I'll be happy to pick it up regardless.
> >
> > Would you provide a Fixes line so the stable trees can pick this up for
> > the necessary kernel versions?
> 
> Sorry for delay, you can add my
> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

Thanks Oleksij!

Would you provide an Ack as well for Alexander's other interrupt-cnt
patch involving a change from atomic_t to atomic_long_t? [^1]

William Breathitt Gray

[^1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250331152222.2263776-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com/