Re: [PATCH 38/80] iio: temperature: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls

[Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Jonathan,

On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 11:26:31AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:25:02 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:00:02 +0200
> > Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > If that is the case then:
> > > Acked-by: Crt Mori<cmo@melexis.com>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 09:54, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> > > > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> > > > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> > > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>  
> > No {} issues in here so applied to the testing branch of iio.git.
> > I'll push it out as togreg later in the week at which point linux-next
> > will see it.
> > 
> Actually - change of plan.  I'll wait on your set with the others fixed
> up as I don't want to pull in the pm-runtime change if I'm only going
> to have a few of these ready by the end of the cycle. I don't mind merging
> that with the whole lot if they are ready though.

Thanks for the review. I'll send v2 of the iio-related patches soonish.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus