From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D118F2D374F for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754914455; cv=none; b=mYOBlmj/yCKDcw8t2ytooXP0YnnZRoMN5WTsBnwB3n+63QZf+ewKuX2c15XUL3tzraElyTEugUzrgc3DUqKbmYJwqj2ksKHPQAmqO7Bsh7iyjGhLuay8SGxc8kG2OfNwH7KUDkGo8aKwCFl1nQeIrHAu9Fo9aq2U6OuKknH+AO8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754914455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oTYLo2HACksWvLGkHluWgZb/3LIvpQKBKgeFD0JD+h4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LiwPrbBwUZIKAJTKMBvQxgpAReweayMwAre2mr/8oaduPjd8hXxoBecFem0tl8BsyYsk+YBN3nsKjHOgf4TsmsabXXlPBF49Wzl3srowVaFhfT9pvITtTeSR1au58VrzHtwMQRiDg2WoajoMlmO8Fa77AWR/hPaDxC63iQwQdYo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MtVg8JnO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MtVg8JnO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1754914454; x=1786450454; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=oTYLo2HACksWvLGkHluWgZb/3LIvpQKBKgeFD0JD+h4=; b=MtVg8JnOO56eM1b7KHpPQ4mI3SJLE2FlN9BJ/drKKtvti9ouVbY0Qi4v qXewZF7+G4MUEnIZQowYbziuXPgRupy8m5nC3YRb1mufAkYq1JVGBn4h/ zAU3S/k2FOk+Fp9GfQCGkDFKdoxa+v2nLbuqMRNH9tgZ21dmzyl5SF1Zx XPFn15qIIrgzirtbRk70uTEc/hZoucJsrjYrydl2GhTYOpiAlf8LDXH8a JRX9z8jePbnIpF7NGlrqgPcxVU68ZkxfLGtKaTsD/ArrgrqiWGCRJ45Iu VtJrmFWkjkL+kdQN6sNDkgXechUmbiG4iCKU/ZD2J9fEgJaN9BI//PDyt Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /pqDEk1hQf6K20Iq6+jYiA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: llk9p6avQ+O0XkpVKhWNrA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11518"; a="57306361" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,278,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="57306361" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2025 05:14:12 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 52V3XjNpR8iTJ+83N/OvRA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VR7TWH3dTFeBHmgLQEfCnw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,278,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="170104974" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2025 05:14:09 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ulRPi-000000052I5-3jUo; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:14:06 +0300 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:14:06 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Achim Gratz Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Andy Shevchenko , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] Fixes and enhancements for the bmp280 driver Message-ID: References: <20241017233022.238250-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com> <20250810185846.114355-1-Achim.Gratz@Stromeko.DE> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250810185846.114355-1-Achim.Gratz@Stromeko.DE> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 08:58:37PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: > Revision History: > ================= > > v1: > - initial proposal, incorrectly prefixed "bmp280" instead of "RFC PATCH" > - patch series presented in the order it was created > > v1 -> v2: > - prefix as "RFC PATCH" > - drop channel switching > - rewrite to present patches in smaller units and in logical steps Do not reuse the same email thread for a new version: The rule of thumb -- new version implies new independent email thread. > With v6.13 a change was made to the bmp280 drivers to use MODE_FORCED > instead of MODE_NORMAL. This broke userspace functionality: reading > from sysfs interfaces no longer worked and an error was thrown > "Measurement cycle didn't complete". This series fixes the underlying > bugs affecting the measurement time calculation and implements > additional functionality not available for the BMx280 devices > previously to allow the use of the sysfs interface in MODE_NORMAL > again and control the corresponding parameters. The implementation > follows the already existing facilities for the BMx[35]80 devices even > though the actual functionality of the BMx280 devices is slightly > different. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko