> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - enum: [INT1, INT2]
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: INT1
> > +          - const: INT2
> 
> This is better written as:
> 
> minItems: 1
> items:
>   - enum: [INT1, INT2]
>   - const: INT2
> 
> It is mainly better because using 'oneOf' results in poor error 
> messages.

But wouldn't that allow naming both interrupts INT2? Or is this
magically prevented somehow?