From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>,
jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com,
andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: Fix error handling in viio_trigger_alloc
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 12:42:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ3NHnL2rF0wkqeo@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9aac9a66c02c691e073043f918fef055dca888e9.camel@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 10:26:10AM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-11-07 at 10:02 +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> > viio_trigger_alloc() initializes the device with device_initialize()
> > but uses kfree() directly in error paths, which bypasses the device's
> > release callback iio_trig_release(). This could lead to memory leaks
> > and inconsistent device state.
...
> > -free_descs:
> > - irq_free_descs(trig->subirq_base, CONFIG_IIO_CONSUMERS_PER_TRIGGER);
> > free_trig:
> > - kfree(trig);
> > + put_device(&trig->dev);
>
> Yes, device_initialize() docs do say that we should give the reference instead of
> freeing the device but I'm not see how that helps in here. Maybe initializing the
> device should be done only after all the resources are allocated so the code is a bit
> more clear... But doing it like you're doing just means that we might get into the
> release function with things that might or might not be allocated which is a pattern
> I would prefer to avoid.
The put_device() here is the correct (and must) thing to do independently on
the preferences. The problem is that device_initialise() and followed calls
may do much more than just some initialisation.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 2:02 [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: Fix error handling in viio_trigger_alloc Ma Ke
2025-11-07 8:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-07 10:26 ` Nuno Sá
2025-11-07 10:42 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-11-07 16:48 ` Nuno Sá
2025-11-07 18:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-08 10:26 ` Nuno Sá
2025-11-09 13:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQ3NHnL2rF0wkqeo@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox