From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043C13043A4; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 08:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769156003; cv=none; b=mdSZIqMD4MOvLQZOeUV7b+4nCBVsZN/eY1iOJhz9souyrTi+2zFhoZ/WcjXQ8pA16LDDbcaBjLVv35gnhcNwq9+ebosG2W0MnluGLRzMqeDco7ndRfUxUXsNPOXZ3lgUHfpA7iqPwVRvMpdkV1kjN5s3S+/7ZGfH7m94nx7RCVY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769156003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0dx2I9IANgLM6sQ/ypTM8nBAX14iTyBswtJPSpfZscA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mrHCgSdP/eAojF2GYK8sp4UxEnATBVeUOpwMaJQSm75nPJUKJYxscPlCY72MwBATUohfDyIxy+QynoqfIB8fjtDeDT7XZFeOgH21V7tQ+7hCADZ0o/uXh0WQTWqKNelsI/hQxt/U+pAourP+5Gr21S/ZFQGu5+xVrGWNjK0NN4A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Qs6U47Yp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qs6U47Yp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769156002; x=1800692002; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0dx2I9IANgLM6sQ/ypTM8nBAX14iTyBswtJPSpfZscA=; b=Qs6U47YpfY0DjIj/iTAjFW8uxFOtxiFhdjdxTtYNArFdf0IPuSZcmRiT s3sWMdhBPKhQI9UIGC3Emh0Z81gvPfDpgxb8riEdHhAgH/iWU1eq2LCp5 w4G75LM2QcWt3PgxWFo2KtxKCBDcpw/Kx6Y7tAGpbiHJVNH61MbJUybVP TvKdcN0/amLa/WRVXe2QFD+gD3p6ukl+RbDgxFiCAD9rezBDBdV8EvMKz HC/uG0FdrNXvTbGMDQVBoHIpHjq+2BXODCpnkGnJJHlARH4OF2w8ZBZrT 5PxcZ8QsJnqZbeeGA5wQH91cUR4agKzb/XqWZCGgzMrmSq6sz4lhSD53a g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wA3kDQ9lT/GpUNkm5R17kQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 70IHnmBQSaee0ARd+r4BBA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11679"; a="74039241" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="74039241" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 00:13:21 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Lj20tS4uS9imjQ7D85J3gw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oDHeeQzNSliOlEb0BU22xA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="244580909" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.112]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 00:13:18 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:13:16 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Francesco Lavra , Ramona Gradinariu , Antoniu Miclaus , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: accel: adxl380: Optimize reading of FIFO entries in interrupt handler Message-ID: References: <20260119102317.1565417-1-flavra@baylibre.com> <20260119102317.1565417-3-flavra@baylibre.com> <20260122195313.53fde73c@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260122195313.53fde73c@jic23-huawei> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 07:53:13PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:23:17 +0100 > Francesco Lavra wrote: > > > In order to minimize the time required for transferring FIFO data from the > > sensor to the host machine, perform the read from the FIFO in a single call > > to regmap_bulk_read(). > It's a call to regmap_noinc_read() not regmap_bulk_read() > I'll fix it. This is interesting, does it mean the patch was never tested on the real HW? Or maybe noninc is intentional? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko