From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976EC201113; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769178937; cv=none; b=QqjnDe0GSNC4RJ6QVTsMK3ugTWsymcv+vCf70T1H7FDXUt2Xb8ybYtr570MBG8OBvsT4/UEoF+qTZCU+f7RUoVi/HN3+dhW7JXFB+w2x/xuoGaZCxrS6qASqP90tXzNTfcwIRHTpPlZQf9j6LjpdfjRxjBc188cQMGnf6ZbdL7g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769178937; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jjVZNMbXtDNCqUkpyyw0tc0yzNVL/TJiZd9tqUGscqY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rIQndB+G+EigDwPqaPdURepUqy9YMguvnA9+dEPaCS4wjnCOzshNXkuyYDlhCSefQUpkahGFMo5io7h0gqwRYngweWtptuRyDLiibqxcVXth2uJmqXQmOm/FjZXdS/x1AfgAkxVj9LsVjaEH0YlrjIue/CbFIdUjkXdanqO3ozE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=I3USUZQ3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="I3USUZQ3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769178937; x=1800714937; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jjVZNMbXtDNCqUkpyyw0tc0yzNVL/TJiZd9tqUGscqY=; b=I3USUZQ3Fg8XCJSJ7t4jzKbQmVqjMZQJzK4HG8D9Ur/malYTp/SQ3QAW EXxx/ZAIQsEA6v9fzgiqDHiU5O8Ypsi//S6PoL8P6JYoOpR3I20gBSHxn kQOK9y8eZdiPhSF/DjQq841FcWK8wW3+e9QdBodeeCAERYmpvGRdeomuC JBreonZUpXjAvaD0B6wIv32vclgTwLx1cGQ8xe/qdIZBWcAV4KSYRZIRh 3W1ZTs75OleeDKN0FThYKbEOWpGW+KKvUyJAZtS73kxMaoe3Oic3wPMwz LegikrSukmYooFQjg7aV2pW74jFZD2KQHiF+m4WGvaMpS9Kh17gCGJFoJ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WQERexPaRHKCKHZn73Z9NQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lNvbd5L7R/mVV/ZZ2Eu+zA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11680"; a="81543173" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="81543173" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 06:35:36 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nCnHVZr1RsyLQzWSkZJ5Ag== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8Eb73Bx0TQWxGr1xM4HK7A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211911149" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.112]) by fmviesa004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 06:35:33 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:35:31 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: SeungJu Cheon Cc: antoniu.miclaus@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio:frequency:adf4377: Fix duplicated soft reset mask Message-ID: References: <20260123115618.403644-1-suunj1331@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260123115618.403644-1-suunj1331@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 08:56:18PM +0900, SeungJu Cheon wrote: > The regmap_read_poll_timeout() uses ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_R_MSK > twice instead of checking both SOFT_RESET_MSK (bit 0) and > SOFT_RESET_R_MSK (bit 7). This causes an incomplete reset status check. Yes, but this commit message completely ignored discussion https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20251230123609.210454-1-suunj1331@gmail.com/ So it should have summarised the question and answer. Also this one mistakenly marked v2. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko