From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE5D32AAC7; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 09:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769420699; cv=none; b=ut/35r+uf+GF72bnUEptdu6Q/0hDG65pJeQr2OEWmOZJYPn6CpafMtDfE71hWAjRkQGsW1lecSi/loLbku5jsHsZ/3JMoJAdU2xNvWxQaGuzNNkjmCrp62nCHZVK0ofAieq/wXRygmC8S8TEkNvwnc2sQBb2wTZDmoucQJ4Akro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769420699; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E9NYO6dEC81bdCeH3KNCpyXUWxFTYmBKVrFhBjMXBRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jiS/y5xV9vqyMCefah2dVOpJq/h2CJM2tiSG3pU8pAl2G4rTOGanR322bwDn2tdgxjz1L+UiV3HQA1sMeGJVzhLlMu2k2l3NYUZDW2Yo0FmiBcDhSxzL5T2/BYJPKFfaNvXxubHtCn9EWtTjVe8NZO8rBFTe71Cpo95GJm4vOKo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LeHBgEEW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LeHBgEEW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769420698; x=1800956698; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=E9NYO6dEC81bdCeH3KNCpyXUWxFTYmBKVrFhBjMXBRU=; b=LeHBgEEWeb9124ozWmeWz7++nfzl6W3nvsGTl9y81OB12eeYvng4TN1+ jCklmGP5ja/FDcvLPUU9aVofby2vHw5g3vfidzpWcQeLKOsYOYZaw1quX Ut6GtWBPWvGSqTWKeFGeJxwecId+yERSXo/t08KYr05ZkrjwcT4Twcem2 0VET/+dhvZDZNdXa35bP9dP55JEM3klufZbHt9U6v0siGkHdWhdwnKRno jBw0vKEXg0HZCO4ZbX+zjOD8CMmKBNLu2zGdc4QbiXWkJSFzMD8Y9Slnf jfob4v8RDXjeS3zWuybXwoSB4x32zMp9CawQJBSViiYpX8iWvBNJI0mnq A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nSgKtcYGQOGY53o2BYqcnA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bsqjK0owQmiuDUnJ33nP5A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11682"; a="70638708" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,254,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70638708" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2026 01:44:57 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Q8xxuXHrT5WillH1pLhkKA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FAwTdLF5QJSrcAlBEfkEvA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,254,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211730735" Received: from smoticic-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.122]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2026 01:44:55 -0800 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:44:52 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Shrikant Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Use kernel helper for result polling Message-ID: References: <20260121-b4-rfd77402_v5-v6-0-5b944d0605dd@gmail.com> <20260121-b4-rfd77402_v5-v6-2-5b944d0605dd@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 10:26:04PM +0530, Shrikant wrote: ... > > > + 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC, > > > + 10 * 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC, > > > > This makes sleeps shorter by 2. Why? > I have considered the timeout values from the RFD77402 datasheet. > The timeout values mentioned in section 3.1.1 Single Measure are as below: > 1. Every Status Check = 10ms > 2. Whole Flow = 100 ms So, you should do this in a separate change explaining this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko