From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] iio: dac: ds4424: reject -128 RAW value
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:52:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXc5agTyH4XmzKUi@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260123093357.6996154f@jic23-huawei>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 09:33:57AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:03:46 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 07:24:20PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > The DS442x DAC uses sign-magnitude encoding, so -128 cannot be
> > > represented in hardware.
> > >
> > > With the previous check, userspace could pass -128, which gets converted
> > > to a magnitude of 128 and then truncated by the 7-bit DAC field. This
> > > ends up programming a zero magnitude with the sign bit set, i.e. an
> > > unintended output (effectively 0 mA instead of -128 steps).
> > >
> > > Reject -128 to avoid silently producing the wrong current.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > - if (val < S8_MIN || val > S8_MAX)
> > > + if (val <= S8_MIN || val > S8_MAX)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Hmm... So the range is [ -127 .. 0 .. 127 ] ?
> >
> > I think in such case the plain numbers would be more specific than
> > the type related limits.
> >
>
> Check the abs(val) <= 127 given that's what we care about I think?
> Or make it explicit and do
> FIELD_FIT() against a mask that you then use to fill the register
> value (another mask for the sign bit).
>
> Btw use abs(val) to set raw.dx and drop it out of the conditional.
> Even better get rid of the bitfield stuff and just add
> two defines + fill val directly in this function using FIELD_PREP().
> Then both the checking and the field filling use the same defines
> and it should be easy to see what is going on.
FIELD_* macros require compile-time constant masks. Since the next patch
adds support for variants with different data widths (making the mask a
runtime variable), I prefer using an implementation now that remains
consistent with the followup changes.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 18:24 [PATCH v1 0/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 support and scale Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add ds4402/ds4404 Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 18:28 ` Conor Dooley
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add maxim,rfs-ohms property Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 18:27 ` Conor Dooley
2026-01-23 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 10:03 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-25 10:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-26 9:54 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-20 10:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 device IDs Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] iio: dac: ds4424: reject -128 RAW value Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 19:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-23 9:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-26 9:52 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add Rfs-based scale and per-variant limits Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 19:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] iio: dac: ds4424: clear outputs on probe Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 19:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-23 9:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 9:59 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] iio: dac: ds4424: ratelimit read errors and use device context Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-19 19:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-19 18:24 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] iio: dac: ds4424: document output sign and probe verification Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXc5agTyH4XmzKUi@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox