From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3C1313535; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769605477; cv=none; b=c2ssxoBf7ypM1/02F2KdyRLqAwzToAqo3VEZW8PihWLqGmc4gU55mCy0b7XVUp8G5I18MpqT9nwBPFcgYBtF5nMITgIRWa2Egm6hm47Tet2gLPRbOO3v2uM2Fmq8TrfpKRHmOKoxhwsWDc4VYE4UKxu+8JFZ+C83fSiCBge39WA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769605477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9g7MKyv+YMPSADkRHZSPgQS9EgPoF+uHewJscYmXc5I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=I+e4ogkHYMMkQOA+SaFGL5/b/ZKrz9O/jtVOyFdX522T64Az0czpGRIZgp2hPsREMS17qquexVnctztGfyhGEBGt5QgQa5zR0YNl0GHOrsNb3E6e/OvOmv8x19nC04I44P809q8GielDo1NTRbztK03CCYGcKctsk6TRZz3QkGA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ly6URt6t; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ly6URt6t" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769605475; x=1801141475; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9g7MKyv+YMPSADkRHZSPgQS9EgPoF+uHewJscYmXc5I=; b=ly6URt6tqCWzKk9aW40HTzgnEknGUG+tfRoRSCC9jwlMjBd+dkUQ9tqT kFioyaoEspRX9kmc+vwv+x/5l4w8pxZC9AFw+yzPj2pKMeC/0Eozd+Nmc d3pJ/5lP6YKl4IlIiFewmU0KrFsdlUfE7vH0w47nPja7SagR0ZOFzXcha eWeWELVCB7Fw6s4tCIxQOUTkxssdiDLjdljHGWi/rM3pFCYElwRtwppzf d1MP2SquDgwKQfkwsWLTu4W+jB6Ke9ydVzI8YMsP2lXDSttpfWXoVQ2i/ X4XA+9xwbin6mwejkayz8UgS1xw+W1pfwW/a1m9zMkh6QqsbMidXqJVUG w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gcrvQgJYQTioVrMFhSUWKQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: O9IS46ErQsib/ajUkfHarw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11684"; a="70715844" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,258,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70715844" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2026 05:04:34 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vw9SGvMyQVOaxCbYc/5fAA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RTlhx+9dRYC4lBfiInDDbQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,258,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="208500978" Received: from hrotuna-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.196]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2026 05:04:32 -0800 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:04:30 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/20] iio: magnetometer: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT Message-ID: References: <20260128095540.863589-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260128095540.863589-19-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260128095540.863589-19-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:55:38AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Passing IRQF_ONESHOT ensures that the interrupt source is masked until > the secondary (threaded) handler is done. If only a primary handler is > used then the flag makes no sense because the interrupt can not fire > (again) while its handler is running. > The flag also disallows force-threading of the primary handler and the > irq-core will warn about this. > The force-threading functionality is required on PREEMPT_RT because the > handler is using locks with can sleep on PREEMPT_RT. > > Remove IRQF_ONESHOT from irqflags. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko