From: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: trigger: fix use-after-free in viio_trigger_alloc()
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:03:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYOmJeR3x0Mg4GLf@pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260131124416.19576731@jic23-huawei>
On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 12:44:16PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 10:23:33 +0100
> Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Salah,
>
> This is a definitely case of the fix not being anywhere as simple
> as it might look at first glance.
>
> > Once `device_initialize()` is called, the reference count of the device
> > is set to 1. The memory associated with the device must then be
> > managed by the kobject reference counting.
> >
> > In `viio_trigger_alloc()`, if `irq_alloc_descs()` or `kvasprintf()` fails,
> > the code currently calls `kfree()`. Using `kfree()` in this case bypasses
> > the device's release callback and can lead to a use-after-free or memory
> > corruption.
>
> In some cases yes it can cause problems, but please show me an actual
> path to this in the description. It should indeed be tidied up.
>
> >
> > Fix this by calling `put_device()` instead of `kfree()`. This ensures that
> > the memory is freed properly via `iio_trig_release()` when the reference
> > count drops to zero.
>
> This change is not sufficient and causes some cleanup to happen twice
> thus introducing some bugs that weren't there before.
> So take another look.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 2c99f1a09da3d ("iio: trigger: clean up viio_trigger_alloc()")
> >
> No blank line here. Scripts that commonly run on the kernel tree rely
> on the the tags block having no blank lines in it to avoid false positives.
>
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the review!
You're right – my patch was incomplete and can lead to double cleanup
between the error path and iio_trig_release(). I'll rework the error
handling so that once device_initialize() has been called, all cleanup
goes through put_device(), and resource freeing is centralized in the
release callback.
I’ll send a v2 fixing the double-free issue, showing the error path
and correcting the Fixes tag format.
Thanks!
Salah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-04 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 9:23 [PATCH] iio: trigger: fix use-after-free in viio_trigger_alloc() Salah Triki
2026-01-31 12:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-02 10:12 ` Nuno Sá
2026-02-02 20:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-03 11:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 11:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 11:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-04 20:03 ` Salah Triki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYOmJeR3x0Mg4GLf@pc \
--to=salah.triki@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox