From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salah Triki" <salah.triki@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: use put_device() in viio_trigger_alloc() error path
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:08:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZSEVpQBgHlRHbeW@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96b05a514d229b23ea0917447607dd7390ec0e2e.camel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 01:51:08PM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-02-16 at 09:45 +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> >
> > You are absolutely right. My previous version (v3) was logically flawed as
> > it could trigger the release callback before the necessary fields were
> > initialized, leading to an unsafe irq_free_descs() call.
> >
> > Since I don't have the physical hardware to perform runtime injection
> > tests,I relied on manual code path analysis and clearly failed to account
> > for the side effects of put_device().
> >
> > I'm sending a v4 which takes the safer approach: moving
> > device_initialize() after all potential failure points. This way, we can
> > safely use kfree() and irq_free_descs() in the error path without
> > involving the device lifecycle prematurely.
> >
> > Thank you for the catch.
>
> Please just use the same approach Andy did for iio_device_alloc(). I posted
> links (in one of your versions) to that and for the discussion we already had
> on this same function some time ago.
I believe this is the approach mentioned above, id est move device_initialize()
further in the code. But I might misread something...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 22:23 [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: use put_device() in viio_trigger_alloc() error path Salah Triki
2026-02-16 7:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 8:45 ` Salah Triki
2026-02-17 13:51 ` Nuno Sá
2026-02-17 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZSEVpQBgHlRHbeW@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox