Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] iio: chemical: bme680: change MSK->MASK in #defines

[David Frey <dpfrey@gmail.com>]

On 8/15/2018 1:38 PM, David Frey wrote:

<snip>

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c
> index 49bb6b84f181..d62cb88af481 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c

When splitting the patches apart, I screwed this one up slightly.  The 
patch should also include this hunk:

> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static int bme680_read_calib(struct bme680_data *data,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>         calib->par_h1 = (tmp_msb << BME680_HUM_REG_SHIFT_VAL) |
> -                       (tmp_lsb & BME680_BIT_H1_DATA_MSK);
> +                       (tmp_lsb & BME680_BIT_H1_DATA_MASK);
> 
>         ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, BME680_H2_MSB_REG, &tmp_msb);
>         if (ret < 0) {

What is the correct course of action in the situation?  Should I resend 
just this one patch immediately?  Would it get a new version number 
"[PATCH v3 4/7]"?  I think the version number refers to the whole patch 
series, so it seems wrong to bump the revision of one patch and not 
transmit the whole series.

Thanks,
David Frey