From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE91426B764; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776244491; cv=none; b=jJfy34zohQVxlTJ80EHhJY++q00OehTyV9wIc52+UNkBRl5J+0mtqH3+0zpVdFIwqMFFFQSSeT3OBBG6qNsUlzLE/nWFs6uNSY9Af53RDCTB6v1KSNvC/k1VhzGSK3bvs8laE6TS4IjL+vMQKXpjsgERBjwpv+/RgLAjlUT5MPA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776244491; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YG3qsucY75PaYolkdLl5Z34ZgRN3bLfsTCuGSHgPxxg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iulQxq+NVucaJdLT+0cv/Szsv5ANoSncKGYvT/82L3wFKIA+k6JNrmnq+Nr//B2owjvHoBEnPUJeVwEGTyn6vJByaOylAuRKXDHhSnnjxaHQAnHjHVzG+h78FEaQR8eF9/tR+6fmWt2K4vlHhTzC8Yj6odB3BIXeOJkUxkBmkQE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=EX+0GVth; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EX+0GVth" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1776244489; x=1807780489; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YG3qsucY75PaYolkdLl5Z34ZgRN3bLfsTCuGSHgPxxg=; b=EX+0GVthOgJDohCzmDuVYROT4YUmKUjlHk8yvXMTa7vgIwbsAntGtOWC eCZ/rezNgmvRaM3Olo/rFH0rgb17fq9pF2KyBE6A3bdAPNJ41l51C4IUl U1AKHB08ADCB4H+PNRuRJan3RCS7X41iwjCdGGFrtgv+5p7VIODkPu0yf zwxayEdM1x4FYo7vEU1X+KW+ARAstZ2pqvmAVPGFBwdnNpb98e647fCUp vAN4CuwuM1Eeo4WnbCggHCl/w/ggPs+EfaRpflHwVo6mdF0vvaC55TTAF PopJIFkxSjARtZ7SeFvqtt0AJlf6hEfVPxyMWra/FYaBaQDKOl82fA+A2 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RRH4qOC3TO6RP/Ay4YHYkA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 81zuFrmgRWSQS8YIm9Rszg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11759"; a="88295178" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="88295178" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2026 02:14:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EFdSGAjPSJ6vvigbXnLwHg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9GVienvYTB+9BgeKHNAb2w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="230591949" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.34]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2026 02:14:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 12:14:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sanjay Chitroda Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, mingo@kernel.org, nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz, kees@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle check Message-ID: References: <20260415050749.3858046-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> <20260415050749.3858046-3-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260415050749.3858046-3-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 10:37:44AM +0530, Sanjay Chitroda wrote: > Reported by checkpatch: > FILE: drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c > > CHECK: Macro argument '...' may be better as '(...)' > to avoid precedence issues Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko