public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com,
	andy@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 21:33:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adP8g8rYuXbfT3Um@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406080852.2727453-2-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 01:38:48PM +0530, Sanjay Chitroda wrote:
> From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
> 
> Reported by checkpatch:
> FILE: drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
> 
> WARNING: Prefer __packed over __attribute__((__packed__))
> +} __attribute__((__packed__));

Do we need __packed to be there in the first place? Isn't it naturally aligned?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-06  8:08 [PATCH v5 0/5] iio: ssp_sensors: improve resource cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 18:33   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-04-07 17:42     ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-07 19:32       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle check Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 20:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-08  8:22     ` Sanjay Chitroda
     [not found]     ` <FA511CDD-1F98-4E66-BCE8-5156DBAF4359@gmail.com>
2026-04-08 11:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iio: ssp_sensors: use devm APIs for mutex and IRQ resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:14   ` David Lechner
2026-04-07 12:42   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse preallocated RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:07   ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adP8g8rYuXbfT3Um@ashevche-desk.local \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox